• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 9 月期间英格兰丙型肝炎病毒活跃感染负担的演变:一项重复横断面分析。

Evolution of the burden of active hepatitis C virus infection in England from September 2015 to September 2016: a repeated cross-sectional analysis.

机构信息

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e029066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029066.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029066
PMID:31383704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6687009/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of treatment with new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on the prevalent hepatitis C virus (HCV) population in England.

DESIGN

A repeated cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Four secondary care hospitals in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who, in 2015 and/or 2016, had chronic HCV infection and were alive were eligible, regardless of the type of HCV intervention received.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data including intravenous drug use (IVDU) status, HCV genotype, cirrhosis status, HCV treatment history, vital status and treatment outcomes were collected at two time points in 2015 and 2016 using electronic case report forms.

RESULTS

There were 1605 and 1355 patients with active chronic HCV in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Between 2015 and 2016, the proportion of patients with current IVDU increased (10.3% vs 14.5%, respectively), while that of patients with cirrhosis (28.2% vs 22.4%) and treatment-experienced patients (31.2% vs 27.1%) decreased. Among patients whose treatment outcome was known by 2016, high cure rates were observed, with an overall sustained virological response rate of 93.2%. From 2015 to 2016, there was a progressive increase in the proportion of treated patients who were non-cirrhotic, with current IVDU and non-liver transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of patients with HCV remaining in contact with specialised care evolved with a changing landscape of treatment and related health policy. With increasing access to DAAs in UK, high cure rates were achieved in the study cohort.

摘要

目的

评估新型直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗对英国流行丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)人群的影响。

设计

重复横断面分析。

地点

英国四家二级保健医院。

参与者

2015 年和/或 2016 年患有慢性 HCV 感染且存活的患者符合条件,无论接受何种类型的 HCV 干预措施。

观察指标

使用电子病例报告表,在 2015 年和 2016 年的两个时间点收集包括静脉吸毒(IVDU)状况、HCV 基因型、肝硬化状况、HCV 治疗史、生死状况和治疗结局在内的数据。

结果

2015 年和 2016 年分别有 1605 例和 1355 例活动性慢性 HCV 患者。2015 年至 2016 年期间,当前 IVDU 患者的比例增加(分别为 10.3%和 14.5%),而肝硬化患者(28.2%和 22.4%)和治疗经验丰富的患者(31.2%和 27.1%)的比例下降。到 2016 年,已知治疗结局的患者中,高治愈率,总体持续病毒学应答率为 93.2%。2015 年至 2016 年,非肝硬化、当前有 IVDU 和非肝移植患者的治疗患者比例逐渐增加。

结论

与专门护理保持联系的 HCV 患者的特征随着治疗和相关卫生政策的变化而变化。随着英国 DAA 的广泛应用,研究队列中实现了高治愈率。

相似文献

1
Evolution of the burden of active hepatitis C virus infection in England from September 2015 to September 2016: a repeated cross-sectional analysis.2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 9 月期间英格兰丙型肝炎病毒活跃感染负担的演变:一项重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e029066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029066.
2
Comorbidities and medications of patients with chronic hepatitis C under specialist care in the UK.英国专科治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者的合并症和用药情况。
J Med Virol. 2017 Dec;89(12):2158-2164. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24848. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Hepatitis C virus related cirrhosis decreased as indication to liver transplantation since the introduction of direct-acting antivirals: A single-center study.自直接作用抗病毒药物问世以来,丙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化作为肝移植适应证的比例有所下降:一项单中心研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 14;24(38):4403-4411. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i38.4403.
4
Trends in HCV treatment uptake, efficacy and impact on liver fibrosis in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.瑞士艾滋病毒队列研究中 HCV 治疗接受率、疗效及对肝纤维化影响的趋势。
Liver Int. 2018 Mar;38(3):424-431. doi: 10.1111/liv.13528. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Territory-wide population-based study of chronic hepatitis C infection and implications for hepatitis elimination in Hong Kong.全港人口为基础的慢性丙型肝炎感染研究及对香港消除肝炎的启示。
Liver Int. 2018 Nov;38(11):1911-1919. doi: 10.1111/liv.13926. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
The future disease burden of hepatitis C virus infection in Sweden and the impact of different treatment strategies.瑞典丙型肝炎病毒感染的未来疾病负担及不同治疗策略的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;50(2):233-44. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.990505. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
Interferon-free therapy of chronic hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals does not change the short-term risk for de novo hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis.直接作用抗病毒药物的无干扰素慢性丙型肝炎治疗不会改变肝硬化患者新发肝细胞癌的短期风险。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;47(4):516-525. doi: 10.1111/apt.14427. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
8
HBV reactivation in patients with HCV/HBV cirrhosis on treatment with direct-acting antivirals.接受直接抗病毒药物治疗的丙型肝炎病毒/乙型肝炎病毒肝硬化患者的乙肝病毒再激活
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Jan;25(1):72-79. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12754. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Hepatitis C Treatment Differences in Elderly Patients: Single-Center Retrospective Study.老年丙型肝炎患者的治疗差异:单中心回顾性研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Feb;54(2):113-121. doi: 10.1177/1060028019871352. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Change in treatment paradigm in people who previously injected drugs with chronic hepatitis C in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy.直接作用抗病毒治疗时代既往静脉吸毒的慢性丙型肝炎患者治疗模式的改变。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;34(9):1641-1647. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14622. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Drug Use Policy on the Appropriate Use of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C in Saudi Arabia.药物使用政策对沙特阿拉伯丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物合理使用的影响
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jul-Sep;13(3):317-324. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_166_21. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Excellent outcome of direct antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C in Switzerland.瑞士慢性丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗的卓越成果。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jan 18;148:w14560. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14560. eCollection 2018.
2
Real-world treatment of hepatitis C with second-generation direct-acting antivirals: initial results from a multicentre Canadian retrospective cohort of diverse patients.第二代直接作用抗病毒药物在丙型肝炎真实世界治疗中的应用:来自加拿大一个多中心、针对不同患者的回顾性队列研究的初步结果。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Jan 5;6(1):E12-E18. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170059.
3
Effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in difficult-to-treat patients in a safety-net health system: a retrospective cohort study.
安全网医疗系统中难治性丙型肝炎患者接受直接抗病毒治疗的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2017 Nov 20;15(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0969-3.
4
Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir for Previously Treated HCV Infection.索磷布韦、维帕他韦和沃西拉韦治疗既往 HCV 感染。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2134-2146. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613512.
5
Efficacy of 8 Weeks of Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir in Patients With Chronic HCV Infection: 2 Phase 3 Randomized Trials.索磷布韦、维帕他韦和沃士韦三者联用治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者 8 周的疗效:两项 3 期随机试验。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):113-122. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.047. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Oral Direct-Acting Agent Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Systematic Review.丙型肝炎病毒感染的口服直接作用抗病毒药物治疗:一项系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 2;166(9):637-648. doi: 10.7326/M16-2575. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Direct-acting antivirals are effective for chronic hepatitis C treatment in elderly patients: a real-world study of 17 487 patients.直接作用抗病毒药物对老年慢性丙型肝炎患者治疗有效:一项纳入17487例患者的真实世界研究
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;29(6):686-693. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000858.
8
Safety and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in a real-world population aged 65 years and older.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗65岁及以上真实世界人群慢性丙型肝炎的安全性和有效性。
J Viral Hepat. 2017 Jun;24(6):454-463. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12663. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2016.2016年欧洲肝脏研究学会丙型肝炎治疗指南
J Hepatol. 2017 Jan;66(1):153-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Assessing the cost utility of response-guided therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 in the UK using the MONARCH model.采用 MONARCH 模型评估英国慢性丙型肝炎基因型 1 患者应答指导治疗的成本效用。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Feb;11(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/s40258-012-0002-0.