• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

市场中的孤儿药:孤儿药政策的历史

Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy.

作者信息

Mikami Koichi

出版信息

Soc Hist Med. 2019 Aug;32(3):609-630. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkx098. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1093/shm/hkx098
PMID:31384102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6664588/
Abstract

This paper examines the history of orphan drug policy, from the emergence of 'orphans' in the American pharmaceutical market in the 1960s, through the debates and agitations that resulted in the passage of the US Orphan Drug Act of 1983, to attempts in the 1990s to prevent abuse of that Act and restore its original intentions. Although an increased number of drugs for rare diseases have since been developed and marketed, the extremely high price of some such drugs is considered a major public health issue internationally. The present paper traces the origins of this issue to the market-based approach to resolving the problem of orphan drugs embodied in the 1983 Act. The paper also makes visible an alternative trajectory that existed for a while in the United Kingdom but was eventually abandoned in order to help the biotechnology industry grow in the context of an increasingly integrated European drug market.

摘要

本文考察了孤儿药政策的历史,从20世纪60年代美国制药市场上“孤儿”的出现,到引发1983年美国《孤儿药法案》通过的辩论和鼓动,再到20世纪90年代防止该法案被滥用并恢复其初衷的尝试。尽管自那时以来,治疗罕见病的药物数量有所增加并投放市场,但一些此类药物极高的价格在国际上被视为一个重大的公共卫生问题。本文将这个问题的根源追溯到1983年法案中体现的以市场为基础解决孤儿药问题的方法。本文还揭示了一条曾在英国存在过一段时间但最终被放弃的替代轨迹,这样做是为了在日益一体化的欧洲药品市场背景下帮助生物技术产业发展。

相似文献

1
Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy.市场中的孤儿药:孤儿药政策的历史
Soc Hist Med. 2019 Aug;32(3):609-630. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkx098. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
2
A model of effective health policy: the 1983 Orphan Drug Act.一项有效卫生政策的典范:1983年《孤儿药法案》
J Health Soc Policy. 2003;17(4):61-71. doi: 10.1300/j045v17n04_04.
3
The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?美国孤儿药法案:罕见病研究的刺激因素还是商业机会?
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
4
[Orphan drugs].[孤儿药]
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1991;27(2):341-3.
5
The Orphan Drug Act. The first 7 years.《孤儿药法案》。最初的7年。
JAMA. 1991 Feb 20;265(7):893-7.
6
History of Orphan Drug Regulation-United States and Beyond.孤儿药监管的历史——美国及其他国家
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Oct;100(4):342-3. doi: 10.1002/cpt.426. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Establishing a reasonable price for an orphan drug.为孤儿药制定合理价格。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Sep 4;18:31. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00223-x. eCollection 2020.
8
Orphan medicinal products in Europe and United States to cover needs of patients with rare diseases: an increased common effort is to be foreseen.欧美用于满足罕见病患者需求的孤儿药:预计将加大共同努力。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Apr 3;12(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0617-1.
9
Drugs for rare diseases: mixed assessment in Europe.罕见病药物:欧洲的综合评估
Prescrire Int. 2007 Feb;16(87):36-42.
10
The availability and affordability of orphan drugs for rare diseases in China.中国罕见病孤儿药的可及性与可负担性。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Feb 27;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0392-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Research of Global Orphan Drug from a Bibliometric Perspective.从文献计量学角度看全球孤儿药的可视化研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 May 20;19:4201-4220. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S506112. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of rare diseases on the quality of life in paediatric patients: current status.罕见病对儿科患者生活质量的影响:现状
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 24;13:1531583. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1531583. eCollection 2025.
3
The role of public health in rare diseases: hemophilia as an example.公共卫生在罕见病中的作用:以血友病为例。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;13:1450625. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1450625. eCollection 2025.
4
Global insight into rare disease and orphan drug definitions: a systematic literature review.对罕见病和孤儿药定义的全球洞察:一项系统的文献综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e086527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086527.
5
From Innovator Result-driven to Multi-actor Impact-oriented Public-Private Partnerships: Integrating the Patient Perspective.从创新者导向的结果驱动型到多方利益相关者导向的注重影响力的公私合作伙伴关系:整合患者视角。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2024;286:137-168. doi: 10.1007/164_2024_730.
6
Commentary: Which Principles Should Apply for a National Strategy on Rare Diseases?述评:国家罕见病战略应遵循哪些原则?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):27-31. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27353.
7
Orphan drug policy analysis in China.中国孤儿药政策分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1278710. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1278710. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring regulatory flexibility to create novel incentives to optimize drug discovery.探索监管灵活性以创造新的激励措施来优化药物研发。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 13;11:1379966. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1379966. eCollection 2024.
9
Pharmaceutical policy and innovation for rare diseases: A narrative review.药物政策与罕见病创新:叙事性综述。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 13;12:211. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130809.2. eCollection 2023.
10
Analysis of affordability differences for rare diseases in China: a comparison across disease types and regions.中国罕见病支付能力差异分析:不同疾病类型和地区的比较。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Mar 19;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02137-z.