Suppr超能文献

孕期营养状况的人体测量评估:拉丁美洲使用的五种诊断方法的比较 孕妇人体测量分类:拉丁美洲使用的五种诊断方法的比较

[Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status in pregnancy: comparison of five diagnostic methods used in Latin AmericaClasificación antropométrica de las embarazadas: comparación de cinco métodos de diagnóstico utilizados en América Latina].

作者信息

Lins da Silva Suzana, Bresani-Salvi Cristiane Campello, de Fátima Costa Caminha Maria, Figueiroa José Natal, Batista Filho Malaquias

机构信息

Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) Grupo de Pesquisa Estudos da Nutrição Recife (PE) Brasil Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Grupo de Pesquisa Estudos da Nutrição, Recife (PE), Brasil.

Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS) Serviço de Saúde do Trabalhador da GEX Recife (PE) Brasil Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS), Serviço de Saúde do Trabalhador da GEX, Recife (PE), Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Jun 19;41:e85. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.85. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the agreement between five anthropometric methods used for nutritional assessment in pregnancy and to compare the distribution of nutritional status obtained with each method to that of the population of non-pregnant young women in Brazil.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study with data from 1 108 pregnant women aged 19 to 35 years who received prenatal care from September 2011 to April 2012 in health services in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Nutritional status (underweight, appropriate weight, overweight/obesity) was determined using the criteria of Mardones and Rosso, Mardones et al., Atalah et al., (CLAP), and the Institute of Medicine (IOM-2009). Kappa agreement was estimated for the pairs of methods, and the chi-square goodness of fit test was performed to compare the frequency distribution of each nutritional category in each of the methods in comparison to the distribution in non-pregnant women classified according to body mass index (BMI, WHO cut-off points).

RESULTS

Agreement between the methods was observed for overweight/obesity (kappa > 0.60), but not for underweight (kappa ≤ 0.60), particularly in the comparison of IOM-2009 (which relies on prepregnancy BMI) with other methods. The frequency distributions obtained with the five methods showed lower percentages of overweight/obesity and higher percentages of underweight as compared to the reference population of non-pregnant women ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The disparities observed in the present study may have resulted from the heterogeneity among the methods. This suggests that additional surveys are needed to establish population-specific anthropometric standards.

摘要

目的

确定用于孕期营养评估的五种人体测量方法之间的一致性,并比较每种方法所获得的营养状况分布与巴西非孕年轻女性人群的营养状况分布。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,数据来自2011年9月至2012年4月在巴西伯南布哥州卫生服务机构接受产前护理的1108名19至35岁的孕妇。使用马尔多内斯和罗索、马尔多内斯等人、阿塔拉等人(CLAP)以及医学研究所(IOM - 2009)的标准确定营养状况(体重过轻、体重正常、超重/肥胖)。估计各方法对之间的kappa一致性,并进行卡方拟合优度检验,以比较每种方法中各营养类别的频率分布与根据体重指数(BMI,世界卫生组织切点)分类的非孕女性的分布情况。

结果

观察到超重/肥胖情况在各方法之间具有一致性(kappa > 0.60),但体重过轻情况则不然(kappa ≤ 0.60),特别是在将IOM - 2009(依赖孕前BMI)与其他方法进行比较时。与非孕女性参考人群相比,五种方法所获得的频率分布显示超重/肥胖的百分比更低,体重过轻的百分比更高(< 0.001)。

结论

本研究中观察到的差异可能是由于各方法之间的异质性所致。这表明需要进行额外的调查以建立针对特定人群的人体测量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3cb/6645173/e4c15f24c0fb/rpsp-41-e85_Figure1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验