Song Sang Jun, Yoon Kyoung Ho, Kim Kang Il, Park Cheol Hee
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 23 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-872, Korea.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1563-1570. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07006-2. Epub 2022 May 30.
To compare the incidence of correction loss and survival rate between closed-wedge and open-wedge high tibial osteotomies (CWHTO and OWHTO, respectively) in patients with osteopenic and normal bone.
Retrospective review was conducted for 115 CWHTOs and 119 OWHTOs performed in osteopenic patients [- 2.5 < Bone mineral density (BMD) T scores ≤ - 1] and 136 CWHTOs and 138 OWHTOs performed in normal patients (BMD T score > - 1) from 2012 to 2019. Demographics were not different between CW- and OWHTOs in osteopenic and normal patients (n.s., respectively). Radiographically, the mechanical axis (MA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively (2 weeks after HTO). The occurrence of hinge fractures was investigated using radiographs taken on the operation day. The correction change was calculated as the last follow-up value minus postoperative MPTA. Correction loss was defined when the correction change was ≥ 3°. The survival rate (failure: correction loss) was investigated.
There were no significant differences in the pre and postoperative MA, MPTA, PTS, and value changes between CW- and OWHTOs in osteopenic and normal patients (n.s., respectively); the incidence of unstable hinge fractures also did not differ significantly (CWHTO vs. OWHTO = 7 vs. 7.6% in osteopenic patients; 2.9 vs. 3.6% in normal patients; n.s., respectively). The average correction change (CWHTO = - 0.6°, OWHTO = - 1.3°, p = 0.007), incidence of correction loss (CWHTO = 1.7%, OWHTO = 9.2%, p = 0.019), and 5-year survival rates (CWHTO = 98.3%, OWHTO = 90.8%, p = 0.013) differed significantly in osteopenic patients; there were no significant differences in these results in normal patients (n.s., respectively).
CWHTO was more advantageous than OWHTO regarding the correction loss in osteopenic patients. Intra- and postoperative care that consider poor bone quality will be required when performing OWHTOs in osteopenic patients.
III.
比较骨质疏松患者和骨量正常患者行闭合楔形和开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术(分别为CWHTO和OWHTO)后矫正丢失的发生率和生存率。
回顾性分析2012年至2019年期间对骨质疏松患者(骨密度T值:-2.5<T值≤-1)行115例CWHTO和119例OWHTO,以及对骨量正常患者(骨密度T值>-1)行136例CWHTO和138例OWHTO的情况。骨质疏松患者和骨量正常患者中,CWHTO组和OWHTO组的人口统计学特征无差异(分别为无统计学意义)。通过影像学检查,在术前和术后(HTO术后2周)评估机械轴(MA)、胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)和胫骨后倾(PTS)。利用手术当天拍摄的X线片调查铰链骨折的发生情况。矫正变化计算为末次随访值减去术后MPTA。当矫正变化≥3°时定义为矫正丢失。研究生存率(失败定义为矫正丢失)。
骨质疏松患者和骨量正常患者中,CWHTO组和OWHTO组术前和术后的MA、MPTA、PTS及数值变化均无显著差异(分别为无统计学意义);不稳定铰链骨折的发生率也无显著差异(骨质疏松患者中,CWHTO组与OWHTO组分别为7%和7.6%;骨量正常患者中,分别为2.9%和3.6%;均无统计学意义)。骨质疏松患者中,平均矫正变化(CWHTO组=-0.6°,OWHTO组=-1.3°,p=0.007)、矫正丢失发生率(CWHTO组=1.7%,OWHTO组=9.2%,p=0.019)和5年生存率(CWHTO组=98.3%,OWHTO组=90.8%,p=0.013)有显著差异;骨量正常患者在这些结果上无显著差异(分别为无统计学意义)。
在骨质疏松患者中,CWHTO在矫正丢失方面比OWHTO更具优势。对骨质疏松患者行OWHTO时,需要采取考虑骨质较差情况的术中及术后护理措施。
III级。