Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Brown School, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct 1;110(4):1026-1033. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz163.
Stunted growth is a significant public health problem in many low-income countries.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 1 egg per day on child growth in rural Malawi.
We conducted an individually randomized controlled trial in which 660 children aged 6-9 mo were equally allocated into an intervention (1 egg/d) or control group. Eggs were provided during twice-weekly home visits for 6 mo. Control households were visited at the same frequency. Assessors blinded to intervention group measured length, weight, head circumference, and midupper arm circumference at baseline and the 6-mo follow-up visit. To assess adherence, multipass 24-h dietary recalls were administered at baseline, 3-mo, and 6-mo visits.
Between February and July 2018, 660 children were randomly assigned into the intervention (n = 331) and control (n = 329) groups. Losses to follow-up totaled 10%. In the intervention group, egg consumption increased from 3.9% at baseline to 84.5% and 70.3% at the 3-mo and 6-mo visits, whereas in the control group, it remained below 8% at all study visits. The baseline prevalence of stunting was 14%, underweight was 8%, and wasting was 1% and did not differ by group. There was no intervention effect on length-for-age, weight-for-age, or weight-for-length z scores. There was a significantly higher head circumference for age z score of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.34) in the egg group compared with the control group. There was a significant interaction with maternal education (P = 0.024), with an effect on length-for-age z score only among children whose mothers had higher education.
The provision of 1 egg per day to children in rural Malawi had no overall effect on linear growth. A background diet rich in animal source foods and low prevalence of stunting at baseline may have limited the potential impact. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03385252.
在许多低收入国家,生长迟缓是一个严重的公共卫生问题。
本研究旨在评估每天食用 1 个鸡蛋对马拉维农村儿童生长的影响。
我们进行了一项个体随机对照试验,将 660 名 6-9 月龄儿童等分为干预组(每天 1 个鸡蛋)和对照组。鸡蛋在 6 个月的时间内通过每周两次的家访提供。对照组以相同的频率进行家访。评估人员在基线和 6 个月随访时对长度、体重、头围和中上臂围进行盲法测量。为了评估依从性,在基线、3 个月和 6 个月的访视时进行了多次 24 小时膳食回忆。
2018 年 2 月至 7 月,660 名儿童被随机分配到干预组(n=331)和对照组(n=329)。随访损失总计 10%。在干预组中,鸡蛋的摄入量从基线时的 3.9%增加到 3 个月和 6 个月时的 84.5%和 70.3%,而在对照组中,所有研究访视时均低于 8%。基线时生长迟缓的患病率为 14%,体重不足为 8%,消瘦为 1%,且两组之间无差异。干预对年龄别身长 Z 评分、年龄别体重 Z 评分或身长别体重 Z 评分均无影响。与对照组相比,鸡蛋组的年龄别头围 Z 评分高 0.18(95%CI:0.01,0.34),差异有统计学意义。这种效应与母亲的教育程度存在显著的交互作用(P=0.024),仅在母亲受过较高教育的儿童中对年龄别身长 Z 评分有影响。
在马拉维农村地区,每天给儿童提供 1 个鸡蛋对线性生长没有总体影响。以动物源性食物为主的基础饮食丰富,且基线时生长迟缓的患病率较低,这可能限制了潜在的影响。本试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03385252。