Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1115-1119. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz090.
With advances in technology, patients increasingly expect to access their health information on their phones and computers seamlessly, whenever needed, to meet their clinical needs. The 1996 passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), modifications made by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and the recent 21st Century Cures Act (Cures) promise to make patients' health information available to them without special effort and at no cost. However, inconsistencies among these policies' definitions of what is included in "health information", widespread variation in electronic health record system capabilities, and differences in local health system policies around health data release have created a confusing landscape for patients, health care providers, and third parties who reuse health information. In this article, we present relevant regulatory history, describe challenges to health data portability and fluidity, and present the authors' policy recommendations for lawmakers to consider so that the vision of HIPAA, HITECH, and Cures may be fulfilled.
随着技术的进步,患者越来越期望随时随地通过手机和电脑无缝访问他们的健康信息,以满足他们的临床需求。1996 年《健康保险携带和责任法案》(HIPAA)的通过、《经济和临床健康信息技术法案》(HITECH)的修改以及最近的《21 世纪治愈法案》(Cures)承诺让患者无需特别努力和付费即可获得他们的健康信息。然而,这些政策对“健康信息”所包含内容的定义不一致、电子健康记录系统功能的广泛差异以及各地卫生系统在发布健康数据方面的政策差异,给患者、医疗服务提供者和重新使用健康信息的第三方造成了混乱。在本文中,我们介绍了相关的监管历史,描述了健康数据可移植性和流动性面临的挑战,并提出了作者对立法者的政策建议,以便 HIPAA、HITECH 和 Cures 的愿景能够得以实现。