Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, United States of America; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, United States of America.
Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:106066. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106066. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
Most clinical and laboratory smoking research studies require that participants smoke at a certain level to be eligible for enrollment. However, there is limited evidence that use of these cutoffs differentiates groups of smokers along clinically meaningful criteria.
Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we analyzed data from daily smokers in the National Epidemiologic Study of Alcohol Use and Related Conditions - III (NESARC-III) to examine the utility of smoking rates for determining whether participants met DSM-5 criteria for tobacco use disorder, experienced nicotine withdrawal or had a history of failed quit attempts. We also examined whether relationships between these variables differed as a function of key sample characteristics.
Smoking rate exhibited a weak relationship with the presence of tobacco use disorder (AUC = 0.664), whether individuals experience nicotine withdrawal (AUC = 0.672) and whether individuals had a history of failed quit attempts (AUC = 0.578). The relationship between smoking rate and a history of failed quit attempts was weaker for women than men (p < .05). Otherwise, utility did not differ as a function of sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, or use of multiple tobacco products. Optimal cutoffs varied somewhat across indices, but the largest number of correct classifications occurred at very low smoking rates.
Researchers should consider abandoning the use of smoking rate cutoffs to determine study eligibility. If smoking rate cutoffs are used, a rationale should be presented along with justification for the specific cutoff chosen.
大多数临床和实验室吸烟研究要求参与者达到一定的吸烟水平才有资格入组。然而,仅有有限的证据表明这些吸烟标准能够根据临床有意义的标准区分吸烟者群体。
利用受试者工作特征曲线,我们分析了国家酒精流行病学调查-III(NESARC-III)中每日吸烟者的数据,以检验吸烟率在确定参与者是否符合 DSM-5 烟草使用障碍标准、经历尼古丁戒断或有戒烟失败史方面的效用。我们还检查了这些变量之间的关系是否因关键样本特征而异。
吸烟率与烟草使用障碍的存在(AUC=0.664)、个体是否经历尼古丁戒断(AUC=0.672)和个体是否有戒烟失败史(AUC=0.578)呈弱相关。吸烟率与戒烟失败史之间的关系在女性中弱于男性(p<.05)。除此之外,吸烟率与性别、种族/民族、教育程度、收入或使用多种烟草制品无关。在不同指标中,最佳切点略有不同,但在极低的吸烟率下,正确分类的数量最大。
研究人员应考虑放弃使用吸烟率标准来确定研究的资格。如果使用吸烟率标准,应提出理由并说明选择特定切点的依据。