• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估累积式与分布式反应-强化物安排中的偏好与表现

Evaluating Preference and Performance in Accumulated versus Distributed Response-Reinforcer Arrangements.

作者信息

Weston Regan, Davis Tonya, Ross Robert K

机构信息

Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

Beacon ABA Services, Inc., Milford, MA, USA.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2020 Nov;44(6):909-926. doi: 10.1177/0145445519868793. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1177/0145445519868793
PMID:31387363
Abstract

To determine the effects of response-reinforcer arrangements on task performance and preference, participants completed tasks on accumulated and distributed response-reinforcer arrangements. Three males diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder completed tasks before receiving 5-min or 30-seconds access to a preferred stimulus. To enhance discrimination between the two arrangements, color-coded token boards were used to represent each arrangement. Responding was evaluated within a multielement design to compare the response rate across conditions for each participant. A preference assessment was conducted after the comparison to determine whether a preference for one of the arrangements emerged. All participants produced a higher rate of responding in the accumulated schedule of reinforcement.

摘要

为了确定反应-强化物安排对任务表现和偏好的影响,参与者在累积和分散的反应-强化物安排下完成任务。三名被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍的男性在获得5分钟或30秒的偏好刺激之前完成任务。为了增强两种安排之间的区分度,使用了颜色编码的代币板来代表每种安排。在多元素设计中评估反应,以比较每个参与者在不同条件下的反应率。在比较之后进行偏好评估,以确定是否出现了对其中一种安排的偏好。所有参与者在累积强化程序中的反应率更高。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Preference and Performance in Accumulated versus Distributed Response-Reinforcer Arrangements.评估累积式与分布式反应-强化物安排中的偏好与表现
Behav Modif. 2020 Nov;44(6):909-926. doi: 10.1177/0145445519868793. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.分布式和累积强化安排:疗效和偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):293-313. doi: 10.1002/jaba.116. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Accumulated and distributed response-reinforcer arrangements during the treatment of escape-maintained problem behavior.在治疗逃避维持的问题行为期间的累积和分布的反应-强化物安排。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Sep;54(4):1566-1585. doi: 10.1002/jaba.870. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism.工作强化时间表对自闭症儿童技能习得的影响。
Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):600-21. doi: 10.1177/0145445515583246. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
5
Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules.强化物大小和分配对工作时间表偏好的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Fall;47(3):623-7. doi: 10.1002/jaba.133. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.工作强化时间表对自闭症学生的表现和偏好的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):215-20. doi: 10.1002/jaba.188. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.单项偏好评估结果与递增比率强化效能之间的对应关系与每日偏好评估结果的关系。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):763-77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-763.
8
Accumulated reinforcers increase academic responding and suppress problem behavior for students with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.累积强化物可增加注意力缺陷多动障碍学生的学业反应并抑制问题行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Oct;52(4):1076-1088. doi: 10.1002/jaba.570. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Arranging response requirements and the distribution of reinforcers: A brief review of preference and performance outcomes.安排反应要求与强化物分配:对偏好和表现结果的简要回顾
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Jan;50(1):181-185. doi: 10.1002/jaba.350. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
10
A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice.强化物变化与选择的偏好分析
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):1062-1074. doi: 10.1002/jaba.835. Epub 2021 May 14.