Department of Internal Medicine, 'S. Maria delle Grazie', Pozzuoli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Department of Paediatrics, AORN Santobono-Pausilipon, Naples, Italy.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Jan;27(1):8-15. doi: 10.1177/2047487319868326. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
Two different systems for the screening and diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) in children currently coexist, namely, the guidelines of the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the 2016 European Society for Hypertension (ESH). The two systems differ in the lowered cut-offs proposed by the AAP versus ESH.
We evaluated whether the reclassification of hypertension by the AAP guidelines in young people who were defined non-hypertensive by the ESH criteria would classify differently overweight/obese youth in relation to their cardiovascular risk profile.
A sample of 2929 overweight/obese young people (6-16 years) defined non-hypertensive by ESH (ESH) was analysed. Echocardiographic data were available in 438 youth.
Using the AAP criteria, 327/2929 (11%) young people were categorized as hypertensive (ESH/AAP). These youth were older, exhibited higher body mass index, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) ratio, blood pressure, left ventricular mass index and lower HDL-C ( <0.025-0.0001) compared with ESH/AAP. The ESH/AAP group showed a higher proportion of insulin resistance (i.e. HOMA-IR ≥3.9 in boys and 4.2 in girls) 35% . 25% ( <0.0001), high TC/HDL-C ratio (≥3.8 mg/dl) 35% . 26% ( = 0.001) and left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index ≥45 g/h) 67% . 45% ( = 0.008) as compared with ESH/AAP.
The reclassification of hypertension by the AAP guidelines in young people overweight/obese defined non-hypertensive by the ESH criteria identified a significant number of individuals with high blood pressure and abnormal cardiovascular risk. Our data support the need of a revision of the ESH criteria.
目前,儿童高血压(HTN)的筛查和诊断有两种不同的系统,即 2017 年美国儿科学会(AAP)和 2016 年欧洲高血压学会(ESH)的指南。这两个系统在 AAP 提出的降低切点与 ESH 不同。
我们评估了 AAP 指南中高血压的重新分类是否会使根据 ESH 标准定义为非高血压的年轻人在心血管风险特征方面对超重/肥胖的年轻人进行不同的分类。
分析了 2929 名超重/肥胖的年轻人(6-16 岁)的样本,这些年轻人根据 ESH(ESH)标准被定义为非高血压。438 名年轻人有超声心动图数据。
使用 AAP 标准,2929 名年轻人中有 327 人(11%)被归类为高血压(ESH/AAP)。这些年轻人年龄较大,体重指数、稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)、甘油三酯、总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(TC/HDL-C)比值、血压、左心室质量指数和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平较低( <0.025-0.0001)。与 ESH/AAP 相比,ESH/AAP 组的胰岛素抵抗比例更高(即男孩 HOMA-IR≥3.9,女孩 HOMA-IR≥4.2)35%。25%( <0.0001)、高 TC/HDL-C 比值(≥3.8mg/dl)35%。26%( =0.001)和左心室肥厚(左心室质量指数≥45g/h)67%。45%( =0.008)。
在根据 ESH 标准定义为非高血压的超重/肥胖年轻人中,AAP 指南对高血压的重新分类确定了相当数量的高血压和异常心血管风险个体。我们的数据支持修订 ESH 标准的必要性。