Ramaraj Arikrishnan, Negi Vir Singh, Kar Rakhee
1Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India.
2Department of Clinical Immunology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019 Jul;35(3):485-488. doi: 10.1007/s12288-019-01079-9. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing is a demanding laboratory test. The most common among recommended tests for LA are dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (LA-aPTT). Although integrated test systems come with manufacturer assigned cut-off, but according to guidelines cut-off should be locally-derived. This study was carried out to find normative range of LA using LA-aPTT and dRV VT tests in south Indian population (n = 100) and using locally derived cut-off values to interpret patient samples (n = 152) in a one-year study period. Cut-off (mean+2.3 SD) for aPTT, LA-aPTT, dRVVT screen and dRVVT confirm assays were 37.5, 45.7, 45.5 and 41.3 s and for normalized ratio and percentage correction of ratio were 1.16 and 15.8% respectively. Among patients, 25 (16.4%) were positive of whom 14 were positive by normalized ratio, seven by LA-aPTT and four were positive by both. Four additional patients could be identified using local cut-off. While the specificity of all screening tests was high, sensitivity of only dRVVT screen was high. All testing laboratories should attempt to derive normative range and locally-derived cut-off. While dRVVT is a good screening test with high sensitivity, however combining LA-aPTT offers advantage of picking up cases negative by dRVVT.
狼疮抗凝物(LA)检测是一项要求较高的实验室检测。LA推荐检测中最常用的是稀释蝰蛇毒时间(dRVVT)和LA敏感活化部分凝血活酶时间(LA-aPTT)。尽管综合检测系统有制造商设定的临界值,但根据指南,临界值应根据当地情况确定。本研究旨在通过在印度南部人群(n = 100)中使用LA-aPTT和dRV VT检测来确定LA的正常范围,并在为期一年的研究期间使用当地得出的临界值来解释患者样本(n = 152)。aPTT、LA-aPTT、dRVVT筛查和dRVVT确认试验的临界值(均值+2.3标准差)分别为37.5、45.7、45.5和41.3秒,标准化比值和比值校正百分比的临界值分别为1.16和15.8%。在患者中,25例(16.4%)呈阳性,其中14例通过标准化比值呈阳性,7例通过LA-aPTT呈阳性,4例两者均呈阳性。使用当地临界值还可额外识别出4例患者。虽然所有筛查试验的特异性都很高,但只有dRVVT筛查的敏感性较高。所有检测实验室都应尝试得出正常范围和当地得出的临界值。虽然dRVVT是一种敏感性较高的良好筛查试验,但结合LA-aPTT可提高检测出dRVVT阴性病例的优势。