Suppr超能文献

气栓症候群,探讨可能的诊断标准。

Aerotoxic syndrome, discussion of possible diagnostic criteria.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical Spectrum Twente Hospital, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Lelystad, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020 May;58(5):414-416. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1649419. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

Abstract

The term aerotoxic syndrome (ATS) was proposed 20 years ago to describe a constellation of symptoms reported by pilots and cabin crew following exposure to hydraulic fluids, engine oil, and pyrolysis products during flight. Hydraulic fluids and engine oil contain a large number of potentially toxic chemicals, including various organophosphate compounds (OPCs). However, ATS is not yet recognised as a valid diagnosis in aviation or general medicine, because the incidence and aetiology continues to be debated. Early studies report findings from symptom surveys or cognitive assessments of small samples of self-selected aircrew, but objective measures of exposure were lacking. Over the last decade, researchers have used more sophisticated techniques to measure exposure, such as on board monitoring studies and biomarkers of exposure (e.g., reduced levels of serum butyrylcholinesterases [BChE]) and more sophisticated techniques to detect nervous system injuries such as fMRI and autoantibody testing. Consideration has also been given to inter-individual differences in the ability to metabolise certain chemical compounds as a result of genetic polymorphisms and exclusion of other potential causes of ill health. We discuss factors which suggest a diagnosis of probable ATS; recommend an assessment protocol which incorporates the aforementioned techniques; and propose diagnostic criteria for probable ATS, based on our previously reported findings in aircrew and the results of recent studies.

摘要

航空相关毒性综合征(Aerotoxic syndrome,ATS)这一术语于 20 年前被提出,用于描述飞行员和客舱机组人员在飞行过程中暴露于液压油、发动机油和热解产物后出现的一系列症状。液压油和发动机油中含有大量潜在有毒化学物质,包括各种有机磷酸酯化合物(organophosphate compounds,OPCs)。然而,航空或一般医学领域尚未将 ATS 确认为有效诊断,因为其发病率和病因仍存在争议。早期研究报告了来自症状调查或对自选择机组人员的小样本认知评估的结果,但缺乏暴露的客观测量。在过去十年中,研究人员使用了更复杂的技术来测量暴露,例如机载监测研究和暴露生物标志物(例如,血清丁酰胆碱酯酶水平降低),以及更复杂的技术来检测神经系统损伤,如功能磁共振成像和自身抗体检测。此外,还考虑了个体间由于遗传多态性而对某些化学化合物代谢能力的差异,以及排除其他潜在健康问题的原因。我们讨论了提示可能 ATS 诊断的因素;建议采用包含上述技术的评估方案;并根据我们之前在机组人员中的报告结果和最近的研究结果,提出可能 ATS 的诊断标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验