Suppr超能文献

生物相似性和社会文化多样性的争议领域。

Contested domains of biological similarities and sociocultural diversity.

机构信息

Formerly Professor of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160011, India,

出版信息

J Biosci. 2019 Jul;44(3).

Abstract

Scientists and social scientists often read the same text differently. They also construct categories having the same nomenclature independently. Many of us also work in isolated domains, rarely reading texts researched and documented by others. We conduct our research within the defined format of our disciplines. We engage with others only when contestations emerge and challenge some of the rooted paradigms of each other's disciplines. This paper reflects the reactions of a social scientist to texts on population genetics and attempts to arrive at the genetic theory of the origin of ethnological history of human populations in India. Inadvertently, most of these intensely researched and passionately documented DNA evidence present a serious challenge to the discourse of cultural pluralism and social diversity that the humanist perspective of science and social science takes pride in documenting. This paper is based on secondary resource materials and the methodology adopted is that of narrative research.

摘要

科学家和社会科学家经常以不同的方式阅读同一文本。他们也会独立构建具有相同术语的类别。我们中的许多人也在孤立的领域工作,很少阅读其他人研究和记录的文本。我们在学科定义的格式内进行研究。只有在出现争议并挑战彼此学科的一些既定范式时,我们才会与他人接触。本文反映了一位社会科学家对人口遗传学文本的反应,并试图得出关于印度人类群体民族学历史起源的遗传理论。无意中,这些经过深入研究和热情记录的 DNA 证据大多对科学和社会科学的人文主义视角引以为豪的文化多元主义和社会多样性话语构成了严峻挑战。本文基于二手资料,采用的方法是叙述性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验