Silva André Luiz Oliveira da, Moreira Josino Costa
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fiocruz. R. Leopoldo Bulhões 1480, Manguinhos. 21041-210 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Aug 5;24(8):3013-3024. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018248.24282017.
Brazil was one of the first countries in the world to ban Electronic Smoking Devices (ESDs). This ban was motivated by the lack of evidence regarding the alleged therapeutic properties and harmlessness of these products. Anvisa was criticized for this move, especially by electronic cigarette's users groups. These groups argue that prohibition prevented people's access to a product that would aid smoking cessation and be less toxic than ordinary cigarettes. Thus, the question arises as to whether this decision was successful. Available data show that ESDs have diverse formulations and some toxic substances are released at significant levels during use. Studies in animals and humans have shown a potential toxic effect, also affecting the health of passive smokers. Studies are still inconclusive regarding its use as a cessation tool. A high level of use among adolescents was observed in countries whose use was authorized. Thus, Brazil's ban prevented the population from consuming a product that has not been proven effective toward smoking cessation, with indications of significant toxicity and highly attractive to young people.
巴西是世界上最早禁止电子吸烟装置(ESD)的国家之一。这一禁令的出台是因为缺乏关于这些产品所谓治疗特性和无害性的证据。国家卫生监督局(Anvisa)此举受到了批评,尤其是来自电子烟用户群体的批评。这些群体认为,禁令阻碍了人们获得一种有助于戒烟且毒性低于普通香烟的产品。因此,这一决定是否成功就成了问题。现有数据表明,电子吸烟装置有多种配方,使用过程中会释放出大量有毒物质。对动物和人类的研究表明其具有潜在毒性作用,还会影响被动吸烟者的健康。关于其作为戒烟工具的使用,研究仍无定论。在授权使用电子吸烟装置的国家,青少年中的使用率很高。因此,巴西的禁令使民众无法消费一种尚未被证明对戒烟有效的产品,该产品显示出明显毒性且对年轻人极具吸引力。