Suppr超能文献

印度全国禁止电子烟后电子烟零售商店面的可获得性:一项多中心合规性评估。

E-cigarette retailer storefront availability following a nationwide prohibition of e-cigarettes in India: A multicentric compliance assessment.

作者信息

Amalia Beladenta, Kapoor Shivam, Sharma Renu, Singh Rana J

机构信息

Tobacco Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Tobacco Control Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Jul 15;6:42. doi: 10.18332/tpc/123822. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the availability of retailer storefronts that continued to sell electronic nicotine/non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS) in India, and characterise such retailers following the promulgation of 2019 Indian Ordinance and Act (Ordinance/Act) that prohibit ENDS/ENNDS nationwide.

METHODS

Discreet observations were conducted of retailer storefronts across different socioeconomic zones in nine major cities of India (Bengaluru, Chandigarh, Dehradun, Delhi, Indore, Kolkata, Ludhiana, Raipur, and Ranchi) from 28 November 2019 to 22 January 2020 to identify the availability of ENDS/ENNDS (i.e. electronic cigarettes, e-cigarette liquid, e-cigarette accessories, heated tobacco products (HTPs), and HTPs accessories). We report the number and proportion (%) of retailers that sold ENDS/ENNDS. Other characteristics of the retailers are also described, including indirect evaluation of the retailer's awareness of the Ordinance/Act.

RESULTS

Of the 199 retailer storefronts visited, 37 (18.6%) sold ENDS/ENNDS and, therefore, did not comply with the Ordinance/Act. The highest availability of non-compliant retailers was in Kolkata (n=26; 83.9%). The majority of the non-compliant retailers were tobacco retailers (n=35; 94.6%), sold e-cigarettes (n=22; 59.5%), and e-cigarette accessories (n=24; 64.9%). Although many of the non-compliant retailers displayed their ENDS/ENNDS products (n=33; 89.2%) and did not feature health warnings related to ENDS/ENNDS (n=32; 86.5%) in the stores, nearly 90% (n=33) were aware of the Ordinance/Act.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a nationwide ban, ENDS/ENNDS are still available in major cities in India, and concentrated in a particular city. Indian authorities should focus on law enforcement to ensure that the prohibition is effectively implemented.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估印度持续销售电子尼古丁/非尼古丁输送系统(ENDS/ENNDS)的零售店面的可及性,并在2019年印度法令和法案(法令/法案)颁布后对这些零售商进行特征描述,该法令/法案在全国范围内禁止ENDS/ENNDS。

方法

2019年11月28日至2020年1月22日,对印度九个主要城市(班加罗尔、昌迪加尔、德拉敦、德里、印多尔、加尔各答、卢迪亚纳、赖布尔和兰契)不同社会经济区域的零售店面进行了暗访,以确定ENDS/ENNDS(即电子烟、电子烟液、电子烟配件、加热烟草制品(HTP)和HTP配件)的可及性。我们报告了销售ENDS/ENNDS的零售商的数量和比例(%)。还描述了零售商的其他特征,包括对零售商对法令/法案知晓情况的间接评估。

结果

在走访的199个零售店面中,37个(18.6%)销售ENDS/ENNDS,因此不符合法令/法案。违规零售商比例最高的是加尔各答(n = 26;83.9%)。大多数违规零售商是烟草零售商(n = 35;94.6%),销售电子烟(n = 22;59.5%)和电子烟配件(n = 24;64.9%)。尽管许多违规零售商在店内展示了他们的ENDS/ENNDS产品(n = 33;89.2%),且未展示与ENDS/ENNDS相关的健康警告(n = 32;86.5%),但近90%(n = 33)知晓法令/法案。

结论

尽管全国范围内已实施禁令,但ENDS/ENNDS在印度主要城市仍有销售,且集中在特定城市。印度当局应加强执法,以确保禁令有效实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b4/7549508/8afada924247/TPC-6-42-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验