Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg , Fribourg , Switzerland.
Ergonomics. 2019 Nov;62(11):1377-1391. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1652353. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Given the increasing capabilities of highly automated systems, the article argues for a need to address the issue of social stress in human-machine interaction. It suggests a classification system of subordinate concepts found in the research literature under the heading of social stress. A review of the literature revealed a paucity of studies examining the effects of social stressors on performance. In particular, the review showed a shortage of experimental lab-based work, needed to establish clear cause-effect relationships. The article examined the suitability of different social stressors for lab-based research, not only when humans are the source of stress but also in so-called hybrid teams where social stress is caused by machine agents. The review shows that a closer link is needed between the separate literature on social stress and automation. Finally, three mechanisms are proposed that may predict how social stress may affect performance: 'blank-out'-mechanism, 'rumination'-mechanism, and 'increased-motivation'-mechanism. Theories of ergonomics and human factors may benefit from better integration of research and theoretical work in the domain of social stress. This is due to the increasing capabilities of machines to induce social stress. HMI: human-machine interaction; TSST: trier social stress test.
鉴于高度自动化系统能力的不断提高,本文认为有必要解决人机交互中的社会压力问题。它提出了一个分类系统,将研究文献中的下属概念分类为社会压力标题下的概念。文献回顾表明,研究社会压力对性能影响的研究很少。特别是,审查表明,需要建立明确的因果关系,缺乏基于实验实验室的工作。本文研究了不同社会压力源在基于实验室的研究中的适用性,不仅当人类是压力源时,而且在所谓的混合团队中,社会压力是由机器代理引起的。审查表明,需要在社会压力和自动化的单独文献之间建立更紧密的联系。最后,提出了三种可能预测社会压力如何影响绩效的机制:“茫然”机制、“沉思”机制和“增强动机”机制。人机交互;TSST:特里社会压力测试。