• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处理实验组间可能存在的基线不平等问题——以运动学习为例。

Dealing with Possible Baseline Inequalities Between Experimental Groups - The Case of Motor Learning.

机构信息

Motor Behavior Laboratory, The Academic College at Wingate, Netanya, Israel.

出版信息

J Mot Behav. 2020;52(4):502-513. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1649996. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1080/00222895.2019.1649996
PMID:31389771
Abstract

One important concept of experimental design is the random assignment of participants to experimental groups. This randomization process is used to prevent selection bias, as well as to provide a strong basis for a cause-and-effect relationship between the independent variable/s and the dependent variable/s. In small sample sizes, simple randomization may not provide equal groups at baseline for one or more of the variables, and therefore more restricted types of randomization, such as the stratified permuted-block randomization, can be used. A code was written to calculate the probability that simple randomization will not lead to equality between groups at baseline, and then an example of stratified permuted-block randomization was examined. The findings suggest that for certain variables that are commonly measured in experiments in motor learning, there is a relatively high probability that groups will not be equal at baseline after simple randomization. This observation reflects the small sample sizes usually found in the literature on motor learning. However, stratified permuted-block randomization does lead to greater equality among groups. Implications for researchers are discussed, and a flowchart is proposed that will allow researchers to decide whether to use simple or stratified randomization.

摘要

实验设计的一个重要概念是将参与者随机分配到实验组。这种随机化过程用于防止选择偏差,并为独立变量和因变量之间的因果关系提供坚实的基础。在样本量较小的情况下,简单随机化可能无法为一个或多个变量在基线时提供相等的组,因此可以使用更受限的随机化类型,例如分层随机区组随机化。编写了一个代码来计算简单随机化不会导致基线时组之间相等的概率,然后检查了分层随机区组随机化的一个示例。研究结果表明,对于运动学习实验中常见测量的某些变量,在简单随机化后,组之间没有相等的可能性相对较高。这种观察反映了运动学习文献中通常发现的小样本量。然而,分层随机区组随机化确实会导致组之间更加平等。讨论了对研究人员的影响,并提出了一个流程图,研究人员可以使用该流程图决定使用简单随机化还是分层随机化。

相似文献

1
Dealing with Possible Baseline Inequalities Between Experimental Groups - The Case of Motor Learning.处理实验组间可能存在的基线不平等问题——以运动学习为例。
J Mot Behav. 2020;52(4):502-513. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1649996. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.在临床试验中,用于受试者随机分组的分层随机区组设计的一种更好替代方法。
Stat Med. 2014 Dec 30;33(30):5239-48. doi: 10.1002/sim.6266. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
3
An alternative proposal for "Mixed randomization" by Schulz and Grimes.舒尔茨和格里姆斯提出的关于“混合随机化”的另一种方案。
Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(4):572-6.
4
Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials.临床试验中置换区组随机化的性质。
Control Clin Trials. 1988 Dec;9(4):327-44. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5.
5
Small samples and increased variability - discussing the need for restricted types of randomization in exercise interventions in old age.小样本与变异性增加——探讨老年运动干预中限制随机化类型的必要性。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 Oct 27;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0224-3. eCollection 2019.
6
Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing.随机试验中组大小不等:防范猜测
Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):966-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08029-7.
7
Chronological bias in randomized clinical trials arising from different types of unobserved time trends.不同类型未观察到的时间趋势导致的随机临床试验中的时间顺序偏差。
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(6):501-10. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0048. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.骨科试验中的随机化程序。
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):834-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
9
Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.使用模拟方法比较最小化法与分层区组随机化的性能。
Pharm Stat. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):264-78. doi: 10.1002/pst.346.
10
[Block randomization in clinical trials].[临床试验中的区组随机化]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 6;53(4):437-440. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.04.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Small samples and increased variability - discussing the need for restricted types of randomization in exercise interventions in old age.小样本与变异性增加——探讨老年运动干预中限制随机化类型的必要性。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 Oct 27;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0224-3. eCollection 2019.