Evang. Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Respiration. 2019;98(5):410-420. doi: 10.1159/000501656. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is very high in stroke patients, whereas the acceptance of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is low. Although telemedicine offers new options to increase acceptance, effective concepts and patient groups are not yet known.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a telemedicine concept consisting of telemonitoring and support when usage time drops.
PAP naive stroke patients with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >15 were randomized in a prospective parallel design comparing home therapy with standard care (SC) as opposed to telemedicine care (TC) over a period of 6 months. The TC group received a standardized phone call to offer help and advice if the average weekly usage of PAP fell below 4 h/night.
Eighty patients were included, 5 were lost to follow-up, 75 (20 females, age: 57.0 ± 9.9, body mass index: 30.9 ± 6.0 kg/m2, AHI: 39.4 ± 18.6) were evaluated. While inpatient usage was similar in both groups, a significant difference was identified after 6 months of receiving home therapy (TC: 4.4 ± 2.5 h, SC: 2.1 ± 2.2 h; p < 0.000063). On average, 4.7 ± 3.1 interventional phone calls were needed (173 calls in total, ranging from 0 to 10 calls per patient), primarily for the purpose of motivation (61.3%), mask problems (16.2%), nasopharyngeal complaints or humidification issues (11.2%), and technical questions (10.6%). Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) differed significantly (TC: 3.7 + 3.2, SC: 6.1 + 4.1; p = 0.008), as well as systolic blood pressure, which was available in a subgroup of 55 patients (TC: 129.5 + 15.2 mm Hg, SC: 138.8 + 16.1 mm Hg; p = 0.034).
A concept of telemonitoring and short telephone calls from the sleep lab raised PAP therapy adherence significantly in a group of stroke patients with moderate to severe OSA.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)在中风患者中非常普遍,而对正压通气(PAP)治疗的接受程度较低。尽管远程医疗提供了增加接受度的新选择,但还不知道有效的概念和患者群体。
本研究旨在探讨一种由远程监测和使用时间下降时提供支持组成的远程医疗概念对中风患者的影响。
将睡眠呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)>15 的 PAP 初治中风患者随机分为前瞻性平行设计,比较家庭治疗与标准护理(SC)与远程医疗护理(TC)6 个月。TC 组在每周平均每周使用 PAP 时间低于 4 小时/晚时接受标准化电话以提供帮助和建议。
共纳入 80 例患者,其中 5 例失访,75 例(20 名女性,年龄:57.0±9.9 岁,体重指数:30.9±6.0kg/m2,AHI:39.4±18.6)进行了评估。虽然两组住院使用率相似,但在接受家庭治疗 6 个月后,差异显著(TC:4.4±2.5 小时,SC:2.1±2.2 小时;p<0.000063)。平均需要 4.7±3.1 次干预性电话(总共 173 个电话,每个患者 0 至 10 个电话不等),主要用于动机(61.3%)、面罩问题(16.2%)、鼻咽投诉或加湿问题(11.2%)和技术问题(10.6%)。嗜睡(Epworth 嗜睡量表 [ESS])差异显著(TC:3.7+3.2,SC:6.1+4.1;p=0.008),以及收缩压也有显著差异,这在 55 名患者的亚组中可用(TC:129.5+15.2mmHg,SC:138.8+16.1mmHg;p=0.034)。
睡眠实验室的远程监测和简短电话通话的概念在一组中重度 OSA 中风患者中显著提高了 PAP 治疗的依从性。