Enright A B, Parker J B
Department of Anaesthesia, Saskatoon City Hospital, Saskatchewan.
Can J Anaesth. 1988 Sep;35(5):462-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03026891.
Alfentanil - nitrous oxide and fentanyl - nitrous oxide techniques were compared in outpatients undergoing therapeutic abortion or dilatation and curettage. Thirty patients were studied in each group. Time to awakening was similar in both groups but patients who received alfentanil responded to verbal commands one minute sooner and were alert 1.5 minutes before those who received fentanyl. At ten minutes post anaesthesia the recovery scores were the same for both groups. Patients who received alfentanil were not street-worthy earlier than those who received fentanyl. During the procedure approximately two thirds of the patients moved. This movement was vigorous in 23 per cent of the patients who received alfentanil and in 30 per cent of those given fentanyl. We conclude that: (1) a more flexible dosage schedule is required in order to prevent disturbing movement of the patient during the procedure and (2) patients who received alfentanil were not street-worthy earlier than those who were given fentanyl.
在接受治疗性流产或刮宫术的门诊患者中,对阿芬太尼-氧化亚氮技术和芬太尼-氧化亚氮技术进行了比较。每组研究30例患者。两组患者的苏醒时间相似,但接受阿芬太尼的患者对言语指令的反应比接受芬太尼的患者早1分钟,且比接受芬太尼的患者提前1.5分钟清醒。麻醉后10分钟,两组的恢复评分相同。接受阿芬太尼的患者并不比接受芬太尼的患者更早具备出院条件。在手术过程中,约三分之二的患者出现了移动。在接受阿芬太尼的患者中,23%的患者移动剧烈;在接受芬太尼的患者中,30%的患者移动剧烈。我们得出结论:(1)需要更灵活的给药方案,以防止患者在手术过程中出现干扰性移动;(2)接受阿芬太尼的患者并不比接受芬太尼的患者更早具备出院条件。