Suppr超能文献

阿芬太尼、芬太尼和恩氟烷作为门诊妇科手术全身麻醉辅助用药的比较。

Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and enflurane as supplements to general anaesthesia for outpatient gynaecologic surgery.

作者信息

Haley S, Edelist G, Urbach G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1988 Nov;35(6):570-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03020342.

Abstract

We compared two narcotic/N2O anaesthetic techniques and an inhalational anaesthesia/N2O technique for outpatient surgery in 59 women undergoing short gynaecological procedures. All patients received droperidol 0.625 mg IV, thiopentone and 70 per cent N2O in O2 plus either alfentanil (15 micrograms.kg-1), fentanyl (1.5 microgram.kg-1) or enflurane. The narcotics were given in a double-blind fashion and all anaesthetic techniques were assigned randomly. Cardiorespiratory parameters remained stable in all groups, with few clinically important changes occurring. Recovery was significantly faster in the group receiving alfentanil, with the time to respond to verbal commands and the time to establish alertness significantly faster than with either fentanyl or enflurane. All techniques provided satisfactory anaesthesia; however, the patients receiving alfentanil had significantly more adverse events than those receiving fentanyl.

摘要

我们比较了两种麻醉剂/氧化亚氮麻醉技术和一种吸入麻醉/氧化亚氮技术,用于59名接受短期妇科手术的门诊女性患者。所有患者静脉注射0.625毫克氟哌利多、硫喷妥钠,并吸入70%氧化亚氮与氧气的混合气体,同时加用阿芬太尼(15微克/千克)、芬太尼(1.5微克/千克)或恩氟烷。麻醉剂采用双盲法给予,所有麻醉技术均随机分配。所有组的心肺参数均保持稳定,几乎没有发生具有临床重要意义的变化。接受阿芬太尼的组恢复明显更快,对言语指令做出反应的时间和恢复清醒的时间明显快于接受芬太尼或恩氟烷的组。所有技术均提供了满意的麻醉效果;然而,接受阿芬太尼的患者比接受芬太尼的患者出现的不良事件明显更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验