Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Asanbyeongwon-gil 86, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Asanbyeongwon-gil 86, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 25;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0848-7.
We aimed to compare early and late outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between Korean type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to investigate the impact of diabetes on the overall incidence of cardiovascular events after CEA.
We retrospectively analyzed 675 CEAs, which were performed on 613 patients with significant carotid stenosis between January 2007 and December 2014. The CEAs were divided into a type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) group (n = 265, 39.3%) and a non-DM group (n = 410, 60.7%). The study outcomes included the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs), defined as fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction or all-cause mortality, during the perioperative period and within 4 years after CEA.
Patients in the DM and non-DM groups did not differ significantly in the incidence of MAEs or any of the individual MAE manifestations during the perioperative period. However, within 4 years after CEA, the difference in the MAE incidence was significantly greater in the DM group (P = 0.040). Analysis of the individual MAE manifestations indicated a significantly higher risk of stroke in the DM group (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes was not associated with MAEs or individual MAE manifestations during the perioperative period, whereas within 4 years after CEA, diabetes was an independent risk factor for MAEs overall (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.48; P = 0.026) and stroke (HR, 2.55; 95% CI 1.20-5.41; P = 0.015) in particular.
Diabetic patients were not at greater risk of perioperative MAEs after CEA; however, the risk of late MAE occurrence was significantly greater in these patients. Within 4 years after CEA, DM was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of MAEs overall and stroke in particular.
本研究旨在比较韩国 2 型糖尿病与非糖尿病患者颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的早期和晚期结局,并探讨糖尿病对 CEA 后总体心血管事件发生率的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 2007 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间 613 例颈动脉狭窄显著的患者中 675 例 CEA。将 CEA 分为 2 型糖尿病(DM)组(n=265,39.3%)和非 DM 组(n=410,60.7%)。研究结果包括围手术期和 CEA 后 4 年内主要不良事件(MAE)的发生率,定义为致命或非致命性卒中或心肌梗死或全因死亡率。
DM 组和非 DM 组患者围手术期 MAE 发生率或任何单个 MAE 表现均无显著差异。然而,CEA 后 4 年内,DM 组 MAE 发生率的差异显著更大(P=0.040)。对单个 MAE 表现的分析表明,DM 组卒中风险显著增加(P=0.006)。多变量分析表明,糖尿病与围手术期 MAE 或单个 MAE 表现无关,而 CEA 后 4 年内,糖尿病是 MAE 总体(危险比[HR],1.62;95%置信区间[CI],1.06-2.48;P=0.026)和卒中(HR,2.55;95%CI,1.20-5.41;P=0.015)发生的独立危险因素。
糖尿病患者 CEA 后围手术期 MAE 风险并未增加;然而,这些患者迟发性 MAE 发生的风险显著增加。CEA 后 4 年内,DM 是 MAE 总体和卒中发生的独立危险因素。