Garner W, Downs J B, Stock M C, Räsänen J
Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Chest. 1988 Oct;94(4):779-81. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.779.
After operative coronary revascularization, 14 consenting adults received conventional positive pressure ventilation (PPV). When they were hemodynamically stable, data were collected during PPV and then during airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). During APRV, airway pressure (Paw) was reduced periodically at the lowest frequency which produced normal PaCO2. As anesthesia resolved, the rate of APRV breaths was decreased until patients breathed only with CPAP. During PPV and APRV, pHa, PaO2/FIO2, and hemodynamic variables were similar. All patients were weaned from APRV without complication. Optimal ventilator design for patients with acute lung injury would provide CPAP as a primary intervention and secondarily would augment alveolar ventilation. The APRV supported oxygenation and ventilation in patients with mild acute lung injury, yet with much lower peak airway pressure than produced by PPV.
在进行冠状动脉血运重建手术后,14名同意参与的成年人接受了传统的正压通气(PPV)。当他们血流动力学稳定时,在PPV期间以及随后的气道压力释放通气(APRV)期间收集数据。在APRV期间,气道压力(Paw)以产生正常PaCO2的最低频率定期降低。随着麻醉作用消退,APRV呼吸频率逐渐降低,直到患者仅使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)呼吸。在PPV和APRV期间,动脉血pH值(pHa)、动脉血氧分压与吸入氧浓度比值(PaO2/FIO2)以及血流动力学变量相似。所有患者均顺利撤离APRV,无并发症发生。针对急性肺损伤患者的最佳呼吸机设计应以CPAP作为主要干预措施,其次是增加肺泡通气。APRV支持了轻度急性肺损伤患者的氧合和通气,且气道峰压远低于PPV所产生的压力。