Suppr超能文献

非体外循环与体外循环旁路手术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。

Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

机构信息

University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Mount Sinai Saint Luke's Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 13;74(6):729-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.063.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concerns remain for a greater risk of incomplete revascularization and reduced survival with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery compared with on-pump surgery particularly in patients with left main disease and extensive underlying myocardial ischemia.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare outcomes following off-pump versus on-pump surgery for left main disease by performing a post hoc analysis from the multicenter, randomized EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial.

METHODS

The EXCEL trial was designed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents versus CABG in patients with left main disease. CABG was performed with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump vs. off-pump surgery) according to the discretion of the operator. The 3-year outcomes in the off-pump and on-pump groups were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) for treatment effect estimation.

RESULTS

Among 923 CABG patients, 652 and 271 patients underwent on-pump and off-pump surgery, respectively. Despite a similar extent of disease, off-pump surgery was associated with a lower rate of revascularization of the left circumflex coronary artery (84.1% vs. 90.0%; p = 0.01) and right coronary artery (31.1% vs. 40.6%; p = 0.007). After IPTW adjustment for baseline differences, off-pump surgery was associated with a significantly increased risk of 3-year all-cause death (8.8% vs. 4.5%; hazard ratio: 1.94; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 3.41; p = 0.02) and a nonsignificant difference in the risk for the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (11.8% vs. 9.2%; hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 2.00; p = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with left main disease treated with CABG in the EXCEL trial, off-pump surgery was associated with a lower rate of revascularization of the coronary arteries supplying the inferolateral wall and an increased risk of 3-year all-cause death compared with on-pump surgery.

摘要

背景

与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)相比,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump CABG)在左主干病变和广泛的基础心肌缺血患者中存在不完全血运重建和生存风险增加的顾虑。

目的

本研究旨在通过多中心、随机的 EXCEL(依维莫司洗脱支架与 CABG 治疗左主干病变的效果比较)试验的事后分析,比较左主干疾病患者行 off-pump CABG 与 on-pump CABG 的结果。

方法

EXCEL 试验旨在比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴依维莫司洗脱支架与 CABG 在左主干疾病患者中的疗效。根据术者的判断,CABG 可在体外循环(on-pump 手术)或不在体外循环(off-pump 手术)下进行。使用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)进行治疗效果估计,比较 off-pump 组和 on-pump 组患者的 3 年结局。

结果

在 923 例 CABG 患者中,分别有 652 例和 271 例患者接受了 on-pump 和 off-pump 手术。尽管疾病严重程度相似,但 off-pump 手术与左回旋支冠状动脉(84.1% vs. 90.0%;p=0.01)和右冠状动脉(31.1% vs. 40.6%;p=0.007)再血管化率较低有关。在对基线差异进行 IPTW 调整后,off-pump 手术与 3 年全因死亡风险显著增加相关(8.8% vs. 4.5%;风险比:1.94;95%置信区间:1.10 至 3.41;p=0.02),与死亡、心肌梗死或卒中复合终点的风险无显著差异(11.8% vs. 9.2%;风险比:1.28;95%置信区间:0.82 至 2.00;p=0.28)。

结论

在 EXCEL 试验中接受 CABG 治疗的左主干疾病患者中,与 on-pump 手术相比,off-pump 手术与冠状动脉下壁供血血管再血管化率较低和 3 年全因死亡风险增加相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验