Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.; Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2412-2420. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.052.
To compare the impact of an inside-out repair versus meniscectomy of a medial meniscus bucket-handle tear in restoring native contact areas and pressures across the tibial plateaus in the setting of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR).
Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested in 6 knee conditions (1: intact; 2: ACL torn and bucket-handle tear of medial meniscus, flipped; 3: bucket-handle tear of medial meniscus, reduced; 4: bucket-handle tear of medial meniscus, repaired via inside-out vertical mattress suture technique; 5: ACLR with bone patella tendon bone autograft and bucket-handle repair; 6: ACLR and medial meniscus bucket-handle tear debridement) at 4 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°), under a 1,000-N axial load. Contact area and pressure were measured with Tekscan sensors.
ACLR with a concurrent medial meniscectomy for a medial meniscus bucket-handle tear resulted in significantly decreased contact area (P < .05) and increased mean and peak pressure in both the medial and lateral compartments across all tested flexion angles (P < .05). The ACLR with medial meniscectomy state also demonstrated significantly lower contact area than the bucket-handle repair state between 30° and 60° of flexion (all P < .05).
Resection of a bucket-handle medial meniscus tear concurrent with an ACLR resulted in significant increases in mean and peak contact pressures in not only the medial but also the lateral compartment. Preservation of the medial meniscus in the face of a bucket-handle tear is essential to more closely restore native tibiofemoral biomechanics.
The increased mean and peak tibiofemoral contact pressure seen with excision of a bucket-handle medial meniscus tear would over time result in increased cartilaginous degradation and resultant osteoarthritis. Decreasing both of these factors through concomitant ACLR and inside-out bucket-handle meniscal repairs should improve patient outcomes by restoring knee biomechanics and kinematics closer to that of the native state.
比较内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂的内翻修复与半月板切除术对前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)后恢复胫骨平台固有接触面积和压力的影响。
在 4 个屈曲角度(0°、30°、45°和 60°)下,对 10 个新鲜冷冻尸体膝关节进行了 6 种膝关节状态(1:完整;2:ACL 撕裂和内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂,翻转;3:内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂,复位;4:内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂,采用内翻垂直褥式缝合技术修复;5:ACL 重建和骨髌腱骨自体移植物联合内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复;6:ACL 重建和内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂清创术)的测试,在 1000N 轴向载荷下。使用 Tekscan 传感器测量接触面积和压力。
内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂的 ACLR 合并内侧半月板切除术导致接触面积显著减小(P <.05),在所有测试的屈曲角度下,内侧和外侧间隙的平均和峰值压力均显著增加(P <.05)。在 30°至 60°的屈曲角度下,ACL 重建伴内侧半月板切除术的状态与桶柄状撕裂修复状态相比,接触面积也显著降低(均 P <.05)。
ACL 重建合并内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂切除导致不仅内侧间隙,而且外侧间隙的平均和峰值接触压力显著增加。面对桶柄状撕裂时,保留内侧半月板对于更接近地恢复固有胫股生物力学至关重要。
切除内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂会导致平均和峰值胫股接触压力增加,随着时间的推移会导致软骨降解和随后的骨关节炎增加。通过同时进行 ACLR 和内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂的内翻修复,降低这两个因素,应通过更接近自然状态恢复膝关节生物力学和运动学,从而改善患者的预后。