• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性和专业人员如何在产科服务中体验和理解以女性为中心的护理:一项快速综述。

How Woman-Centred Care Is Experienced and Understood in Maternity Services by Women and Professionals: A Rapid Review.

作者信息

Gregory Soma, Caffrey Louise, Daly Deirdre, Sheaf Greg

机构信息

School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity Centre for Maternity Care Research (TCMCR), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70086. doi: 10.1111/scs.70086.

DOI:10.1111/scs.70086
PMID:40637288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12243450/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Woman/person-centred care is a key policy objective for maternity services in many high-income countries, both strategically and in terms of service delivery. This approach to care prioritises the individual woman's needs and aspirations over those of professionals or institutions. However, the concept remains ambiguous and practical implementation guidelines are lacking, leading to concerns that it is being practised tokenistically.

AIM

To explore how woman-centred care in maternity services in high-income countries is experienced and understood by women and professionals.

METHODS

A rapid review was conducted to synthesise evidence on woman-centred care from women's and clinicians' perspectives. Five bibliographic databases, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science, were searched systematically in December 2023. Citations eligible for inclusion were peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods empirical studies conducted in high-income countries and literature reviews reporting on studies conducted in high-income countries. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed, with 10% of records double-screened to ensure consistency and minimise bias. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data were synthesised thematically.

FINDINGS

In total, 5295 records were retrieved; after deduplication, 2707 records were screened, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The review identified inconsistencies in how woman-centred care was experienced and understood at all levels of service provision, from policy directives to institutional practices. Diverse understandings of woman-centred care among stakeholders were found to influence interactions. Several studies revealed that professionals' varying interpretations affected their attitudes and approaches to care, while some women were found to hold differing expectations about woman-centred care provision.

CONCLUSION

To realise the policy intention of woman-centred care, further context-specific investigations are needed to provide evidence and evaluation to inform implementation strategies.

摘要

背景

以女性/个人为中心的护理是许多高收入国家产科服务的一项关键政策目标,无论是在战略层面还是服务提供方面。这种护理方法将女性个人的需求和愿望置于专业人员或机构之上。然而,这一概念仍然模糊不清,缺乏实际实施指南,导致人们担心它只是形式上的做法。

目的

探讨高收入国家产科服务中以女性为中心的护理在女性和专业人员中的体验和理解方式。

方法

进行了一项快速综述,以综合从女性和临床医生角度获得的关于以女性为中心护理的证据。2023年12月,系统检索了五个文献数据库,即护理学与健康照护数据库(CINAHL)、母婴护理数据库、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)和科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)。纳入标准为在高收入国家进行的经同行评审的定量、定性和混合方法实证研究,以及报告在高收入国家进行的研究的文献综述。进行了标题和摘要筛选、全文筛选、数据提取和质量评估,对10%的记录进行了双盲筛选,以确保一致性并尽量减少偏差。使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。对提取的数据进行了主题综合分析。

结果

共检索到5295条记录;去重后,筛选了2707条记录,24项研究符合纳入标准。该综述发现,从政策指令到机构实践,在服务提供各级对以女性为中心护理的体验和理解存在不一致。利益相关者对以女性为中心护理存在多种理解被发现会影响互动。几项研究表明专业人员的不同解释影响了他们的护理态度和方法,而一些女性对以女性为中心护理的提供也有不同期望。

结论

为实现以女性为中心护理这一政策意图,需要进一步针对具体情况进行调查研究,以提供证据和评估,为实施策略提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6f/12243450/afcb1c05b705/SCS-39-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6f/12243450/afcb1c05b705/SCS-39-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6f/12243450/afcb1c05b705/SCS-39-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How Woman-Centred Care Is Experienced and Understood in Maternity Services by Women and Professionals: A Rapid Review.女性和专业人员如何在产科服务中体验和理解以女性为中心的护理:一项快速综述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70086. doi: 10.1111/scs.70086.
2
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
7
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring women's motivations to freebirth and their experience of maternity care: A systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.探索女性选择自由分娩的动机及其分娩经历:系统的定性证据综合分析。
Midwifery. 2024 Jul;134:104022. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Defining woman-centred care: A concept analysis.界定以女性为中心的护理:一项概念分析。
Midwifery. 2024 Apr;131:103954. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103954. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
3
Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.
Cochrane有效性快速综述方法指南的更新建议。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 6;384:e076335. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335.
4
Rapid literature review: definition and methodology.快速文献综述:定义与方法
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Jul 28;11(1):2241234. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234. eCollection 2023.
5
Exploring health care professionals' experiences and knowledge of woman-centred care in a university hospital.探讨大学医院中医疗保健专业人员对以妇女为中心的护理的经验和知识。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 5;18(7):e0286852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286852. eCollection 2023.
6
Achieving international consensus on the concept of woman-centred care: A Delphi study.就以女性为中心的护理理念达成国际共识:一项德尔菲研究。
Women Birth. 2023 Nov;36(6):e631-e640. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
7
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search.快速综述方法系列:文献检索指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):412-417. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079.
8
"It could not have been more different." Comparing experiences of hospital-based birth and homebirth in Ireland: A mixed-methods survey.“这两者之间的差异再明显不过了。”比较爱尔兰基于医院的分娩和家庭分娩的经验:一项混合方法调查。
Women Birth. 2023 Jul;36(4):e445-e452. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
9
Dehumanized, Violated, and Powerless: An Australian Survey of Women's Experiences of Obstetric Violence in the Past 5 Years.去人性化、侵犯和无力感:澳大利亚过去 5 年中女性经历产科暴力的调查。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Jul;30(9):2320-2344. doi: 10.1177/10778012221140138. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
What women identify as positive aspects and areas for improvement of maternity care and services in Ireland: An online survey.爱尔兰母婴保健和服务中女性认为的积极方面和有待改进的领域:一项在线调查。
Women Birth. 2023 Jul;36(4):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 26.