Phillips Oliver L, Sullivan Martin J P, Baker Tim R, Monteagudo Mendoza Abel, Vargas Percy Núñez, Vásquez Rodolfo
1School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Jardín Botánico de Missouri, Jr. Bolognesi, 19230 Oxapampa, Peru.
Surv Geophys. 2019;40(4):913-935. doi: 10.1007/s10712-019-09540-0. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
The mass of carbon contained in trees is governed by the volume and density of their wood. This represents a challenge to most remote sensing technologies, which typically detect surface structure and parameters related to wood volume but not to its density. Since wood density is largely determined by taxonomic identity this challenge is greatest in tropical forests where there are tens of thousands of tree species. Here, using pan-tropical literature and new analyses in Amazonia with plots with reliable identifications we assess the impact that species-related variation in wood density has on biomass estimates of mature tropical forests. We find impacts of species on forest biomass due to wood density at all scales from the individual tree up to the whole biome: variation in tree species composition regulates how much carbon forests can store. Even local differences in composition can cause variation in forest biomass and carbon density of 20% between subtly different local forest types, while additional large-scale floristic variation leads to variation in mean wood density of 10-30% across Amazonia and the tropics. Further, because species composition varies at all scales and even vertically within a stand, our analysis shows that bias and uncertainty always result if individual identity is ignored. Since sufficient inventory-based evidence based on botanical identification now exists to show that species composition matters biome-wide for biomass, we here assemble and provide mean basal-area-weighted wood density values for different forests across the lowand tropical biome. These range widely, from 0.467 to 0.728 g cm with a pan-tropical mean of 0.619 g cm. Our analysis shows that mapping tropical ecosystem carbon always benefits from locally validated measurement of tree-by-tree botanical identity combined with tree-by-tree measurement of dimensions. Therefore whenever possible, efforts to map and monitor tropical forest carbon using remote sensing techniques should be combined with tree-level measurement of species identity by botanists working in inventory plots.
树木中所含碳的质量取决于其木材的体积和密度。这对大多数遥感技术构成了挑战,因为这些技术通常只能检测与木材体积相关的表面结构和参数,而无法检测木材密度。由于木材密度在很大程度上由分类身份决定,因此在拥有数万种树的热带森林中,这一挑战最为严峻。在此,我们利用泛热带文献以及在亚马逊地区进行的新分析(涉及具有可靠物种鉴定的样地),评估了与物种相关的木材密度变化对成熟热带森林生物量估计的影响。我们发现,从单棵树到整个生物群落的所有尺度上,物种都会因木材密度而对森林生物量产生影响:树种组成的变化决定了森林能够储存多少碳。即使是局部组成差异,也会导致在细微不同的局部森林类型之间,森林生物量和碳密度出现20%的差异,而更大规模的植物区系差异则导致整个亚马逊地区和热带地区的平均木材密度变化10% - 30%。此外,由于物种组成在所有尺度上甚至在林分内垂直方向上都会发生变化,我们的分析表明,如果忽略个体身份,总是会产生偏差和不确定性。鉴于现在已有足够基于植物鉴定的清查证据表明,物种组成在生物群落范围内对生物量至关重要,我们在此汇总并提供了低地和热带生物群落不同森林的平均断面积加权木材密度值。这些值范围广泛,从0.467到0.728克/立方厘米,泛热带平均值为0.619克/立方厘米。我们的分析表明,绘制热带生态系统碳含量图总是受益于通过实地验证的逐棵树木植物身份测量以及逐棵树木的尺寸测量。因此,只要有可能,利用遥感技术绘制和监测热带森林碳含量的工作应与在清查样地工作的植物学家进行的树木物种身份逐棵测量相结合。