Suppr超能文献

阿司咪唑(息斯敏)和特非那定(敏迪)持续治疗豚草花粉诱发的鼻结膜炎的疗效。

Efficacy of continuous treatment with astemizole (Hismanal) and terfenadine (Seldane) in ragweed pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis.

作者信息

Juniper E F, White J, Dolovich J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 Oct;82(4):670-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90981-5.

Abstract

Astemizole (Hismanal; Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and terfenadine (Seldane; Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals [Canada], Inc., Concord, Ontario, Canada) were compared for clinical efficacy in a double-blind randomized trial during the ragweed pollen season. Sixty adults, with a history of ragweed-induced rhinoconjunctivitis, were matched according to sensitivity to ragweed pollen. Half took astemizole, 10 mg/day, and the rest took terfenadine, 60 mg twice daily. Medications were started 1 week before and continued daily until 1 week after the ragweed pollen season (7 weeks). If the trial medication was insufficient to keep symptoms well controlled, a steroid nasal spray and/or eye drops were used in the minimum dose that would ensure symptoms were not troublesome. Subjects completed a diary of nocturnal and daytime nasal and eye symptoms and recorded the amount of concomitant medications used. Astemizole showed greater efficacy than terfenadine in controlling rhinorrhea; in addition, the astemizole group used less nasal spray. Other nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and use of eye drops were similar in the two groups. Skin test sensitivity to serial dilutions of histamine and ragweed extract was determined 1 and 7 weeks after the start of the trial medication. More tachyphylaxis to histamine was shown by the subjects taking terfenadine, as demonstrated by a larger increase in skin sensitivity over the study period. However, a similar change was not observed for ragweed skin sensitivity. These results suggest that when the medication is started before and continued daily throughout the pollen season, astemizole is more efficacious than terfenadine in controlling nasal symptoms, but there is little difference for eye symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在豚草花粉季节进行的一项双盲随机试验中,对阿司咪唑(息斯敏;杨森制药公司,加拿大安大略省密西沙加)和特非那定(仙特明;美国家庭用品公司加拿大分公司,加拿大安大略省康科德)的临床疗效进行了比较。60名有豚草诱发的鼻结膜炎病史的成年人,根据对豚草花粉的敏感性进行匹配。一半人服用阿司咪唑,每日10毫克,其余人服用特非那定,每日两次,每次60毫克。在豚草花粉季节开始前1周开始用药,并持续每日用药,直至豚草花粉季节结束后1周(共7周)。如果试验药物不足以很好地控制症状,则使用能确保症状不严重的最小剂量的类固醇鼻喷雾剂和/或眼药水。受试者完成了一份夜间和白天鼻眼症状的日记,并记录了所用辅助药物的量。阿司咪唑在控制鼻漏方面比特非那定显示出更高的疗效;此外,阿司咪唑组使用的鼻喷雾剂较少。两组的其他鼻部症状、眼部症状以及眼药水的使用情况相似。在试验药物开始后1周和7周,测定了对组胺和豚草提取物系列稀释液的皮肤试验敏感性。服用特非那定的受试者对组胺表现出更多的快速耐受性,研究期间皮肤敏感性增加幅度更大就证明了这一点。然而,豚草皮肤敏感性未观察到类似变化。这些结果表明,在花粉季节开始前开始用药并持续每日用药时,阿司咪唑在控制鼻部症状方面比特非那定更有效,但眼部症状方面差异不大。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验