• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用科学素养技能测试表明,基本素养是科学素养的重要贡献因素。

Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy.

机构信息

Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401.

Department of Earth System Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238
PMID:31397654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6755321/
Abstract

College science courses aim to teach students both disciplinary knowledge and scientific literacy skills. Several instruments have been developed to assess students' scientific literacy skills, but few studies have reported how demographic differences may play a role. The goal of this study was to determine whether demographic factors differentially impact students' scientific literacy skills. We assessed more than 700 students using the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS), a validated instrument developed to assess scientific literacy in college science courses. Interestingly, we found that Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) reading score was the strongest predictor of TOSLS performance, suggesting that fundamental literacy (reading comprehension) is a critical component of scientific literacy skills. Additionally, we found significant differences in raw scientific literacy skills on the basis of ethnicity (underrepresented minority [URM] vs. non-URM), major (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [STEM] vs. non-STEM), year of college (e.g., senior vs. freshman), grade point average (GPA), and SAT math scores. However, when using multivariate regression models, we found no difference based on ethnicity. These data suggest that students' aptitude and level of training (based on GPA, SAT scores, STEM or non-STEM major, and year of college) are significantly correlated with scientific literacy skills and thus could be used as predictors for student success in courses that assess scientific literacy skills.

摘要

大学理科课程旨在向学生传授学科知识和科学素养技能。已经开发出几种工具来评估学生的科学素养技能,但很少有研究报告表明人口统计学差异可能会产生什么作用。本研究的目的是确定人口统计学因素是否会对学生的科学素养技能产生不同的影响。我们使用经过验证的科学素养技能测试(TOSLS)评估了 700 多名学生,该工具旨在评估大学理科课程中的科学素养。有趣的是,我们发现学术能力倾向测验(SAT)阅读分数是 TOSLS 表现的最强预测指标,这表明基本素养(阅读理解)是科学素养技能的关键组成部分。此外,我们发现基于种族(代表性不足的少数族裔[URM]与非 URM)、专业(科学、技术、工程和数学[STEM]与非 STEM)、大学年级(例如,高年级与新生)、平均绩点(GPA)和 SAT 数学分数,学生的原始科学素养技能存在显著差异。然而,当使用多元回归模型时,我们发现种族没有差异。这些数据表明,学生的能力和培训水平(基于 GPA、SAT 分数、STEM 或非 STEM 专业以及大学年级)与科学素养技能显著相关,因此可以用作评估科学素养技能课程学生成功的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/25a1d64b9fbf/cbe-18-ar31-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/acd199f97931/cbe-18-ar31-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/68c25c3861d8/cbe-18-ar31-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/25a1d64b9fbf/cbe-18-ar31-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/acd199f97931/cbe-18-ar31-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/68c25c3861d8/cbe-18-ar31-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b31/6755321/25a1d64b9fbf/cbe-18-ar31-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy.使用科学素养技能测试表明,基本素养是科学素养的重要贡献因素。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238.
2
Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade.学生在科学素养技能测试(TOSLS)中的表现不会因给予低风险成绩而改变。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3545-9.
3
Prediction of students' USMLE step 2 performances based on premedical credentials related to verbal skills.基于与语言技能相关的医学预科资质对学生美国医师执照考试第二步成绩的预测。
Acad Med. 1996 Feb;71(2):176-80. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199602000-00026.
4
Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments.发展科学素养技能测试(TOSLS):测量大学生对科学信息和论点的评价。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):364-77. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
5
Teens learning epidemiology? A cohort study on epidemiology instruction for high school youth.青少年学习流行病学?一项针对高中青少年进行流行病学教学的队列研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;47:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Predictors of success in dental hygiene education: a six-year review.口腔卫生教育成功的预测因素:六年回顾
J Dent Educ. 2002 Nov;66(11):1269-73.
7
Predicting the admission into medical school of African American college students who have participated in summer academic enrichment programs.预测参加过暑期学术强化项目的非裔美国大学生进入医学院的情况。
Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):187-91. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199802000-00018.
8
Relationship between admission criteria and academic performance in basic science courses in health science colleges in KAU.KAU健康科学学院基础科学课程的录取标准与学业成绩之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02502-4.
9
Teaching the process of science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology.教授科学的过程:教师的看法和有效的方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):524-35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005.
10
Prediction of freshman students' success in a baccalaureate nursing program.预测本科护理专业新生的学业成功情况。
Nurs Res. 1981 Jan-Feb;30(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198101000-00017.

引用本文的文献

1
Reading science: A mixed-methods study of alternative grading with a molecular biology journal club.阅读科学:一项关于分子生物学期刊俱乐部替代评分方法的混合方法研究。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2025 May-Jun;53(3):297-304. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21890. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Promoting inclusivity in ecology, evolution, and behavioral biology education through course-based undergraduate research experiences.通过基于课程的本科研究经历,促进生态、进化和行为生物学教育的包容性。
Bioscience. 2024 Jul 30;74(8):567-576. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biae060. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom.

本文引用的文献

1
Students Are Rarely Independent: When, Why, and How to Use Random Effects in Discipline-Based Education Research.学生很少是独立的:何时、为何以及如何在学科教育研究中使用随机效应。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):rm2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0280.
2
Disparities in science literacy.科学素养的差异。
Science. 2018 May 25;360(6391):861-862. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8480.
3
Development of a Biological Science Quantitative Reasoning Exam (BioSQuaRE).生物科学定量推理考试(BioSQuaRE)的开发。
阅读基础科学文献:本科 STEM 课堂中教授学生的方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Sep;22(3):es3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-10-0211.
4
Building Connections to Biology and Community through Service-Learning and Research Experiences.通过服务学习和研究经历建立与生物学及社区的联系。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Nov 23;23(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00082-22. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
What College Biology Students Know about How Vaccines Work.大学生对疫苗作用原理的了解程度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar75. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0294.
6
A Vision for University Biology Education for Non-science Majors.非理科专业大学生物学教育愿景。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):es5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-12-0338.
7
[DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 2) - Operationalisation and Measuring of Health Literacy from a Health Services Research Perspective].[糖尿病神经病变基金会备忘录:健康素养(第2部分)——从卫生服务研究角度看健康素养的实施与测量]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Apr;84(4):e26-e41. doi: 10.1055/a-1807-0853. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Winter;16(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-10-0301.
4
Using a Concept Inventory to Assess the Reasoning Component of Citizen-Level Science Literacy: Results from a 17,000-Student Study.使用概念量表评估公民科学素养的推理成分:一项针对17000名学生的研究结果。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2016 Mar 1;17(1):143-55. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1036. eCollection 2016 Mar.
5
Is it the intervention or the students? using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research.是干预还是学生?在本科 STEM 教育研究中使用线性回归控制学生特征。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Spring;13(1):41-8. doi: 10.1187/cbe-13-07-0136.
6
Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action presentation to faculty for undergraduate neuroscience, july 2011.《本科生物学教育的愿景与变革:2011年7月面向本科神经科学专业教师的行动呼吁报告》
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(1):A22-6. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
7
Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments.发展科学素养技能测试(TOSLS):测量大学生对科学信息和论点的评价。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):364-77. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
8
Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology.基于社区的探究提高了通识教育生物学中的批判性思维。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Fall;7(3):327-37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-11-0097.
9
Random-effects models for longitudinal data.纵向数据的随机效应模型。
Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):963-74.