• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生在科学素养技能测试(TOSLS)中的表现不会因给予低风险成绩而改变。

Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade.

作者信息

Segarra Verónica A, Hughes Nicole M, Ackerman Kristin M, Grider Michael H, Lyda Todd, Vigueira Patrick A

机构信息

Department of Biology, High Point University, One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3545-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-018-3545-9
PMID:29970190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6029066/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Response-validated multiple-choice assessments are used in college courses to assess student learning gains. The ability of a test to accurately reflect student learning gains is highly dependent on the students' effort. Within our institution, lackluster student effort is common on response-validated multiple-choice concept assessments that are not included as a portion of the semester grade but are used to inform curricular changes. Thus, we set out to determine whether increasing testing stakes by assigning a grade on student performance had an effect on student score and self-reported effort. The Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) is a response-validated multiple-choice assessment used to measure scientific literacy in undergraduates. We administered the TOSLS to students enrolled in a general education Biology course, both during the first 2 weeks (pretest) and the last 2 weeks (posttest) of the course.

RESULTS

Self-reported effort and TOSLS performance were significantly correlated in the ungraded cohort. This relationship did not exist in the graded sections. Our data indicate that assigning a low-stakes grade has no significant effect on mean student performance or self-reported effort on the TOSLS within our general education course.

摘要

目的

在大学课程中,经过反应验证的多项选择题评估用于评估学生的学习收获。一项测试准确反映学生学习收获的能力高度依赖于学生的努力程度。在我们学校,对于那些不纳入学期成绩但用于为课程改革提供参考的、经过反应验证的多项选择题概念评估,学生的努力程度普遍不高。因此,我们着手确定通过对学生成绩打分来提高测试的重要性是否会对学生的分数和自我报告的努力程度产生影响。科学素养技能测试(TOSLS)是一项经过反应验证的多项选择题评估,用于测量本科生的科学素养。我们在课程的前两周(预测试)和最后两周(后测试)对参加普通教育生物学课程的学生进行了TOSLS测试。

结果

在未打分的群体中,自我报告的努力程度与TOSLS成绩显著相关。在打分的部分中不存在这种关系。我们的数据表明,在我们的普通教育课程中,给予一个低重要性的分数对学生在TOSLS上的平均成绩或自我报告的努力程度没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade.学生在科学素养技能测试(TOSLS)中的表现不会因给予低风险成绩而改变。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3545-9.
2
Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments.发展科学素养技能测试(TOSLS):测量大学生对科学信息和论点的评价。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):364-77. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
3
Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy.使用科学素养技能测试表明,基本素养是科学素养的重要贡献因素。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238.
4
Teens learning epidemiology? A cohort study on epidemiology instruction for high school youth.青少年学习流行病学?一项针对高中青少年进行流行病学教学的队列研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;47:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
Curriculum Alignment with Improves Student Scientific Literacy.课程与(填具体内容)对齐可以提高学生的科学素养。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160.
6
Using collaborative two-stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course.采用协作式两阶段考试来缓解大规模入门课程考试焦虑。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Sep;10(5):409-422. doi: 10.1002/ase.1677. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
Reading Quizzes Improve Exam Scores for Community College Students.阅读测验提高社区大学生考试成绩。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar21. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-08-0160.
8
Laboratory Courses with Guided-Inquiry Modules Improve Scientific Reasoning and Experimental Design Skills for the Least-Prepared Undergraduate Students.带引导式探究模块的实验室课程可提高准备最不充分的本科生的科学推理和实验设计技能。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;18(1):ar2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152.
9
Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.进行同行评审并接收反馈:对科学素养和写作技能的影响。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Mar;40(1):38-46. doi: 10.1152/advan.00071.2015.
10
Scientific literacy and the medical student: A cross-sectional study.科学素养与医学生:一项横断面研究。
Natl Med J India. 2020 Jan-Feb;33(1):35-37. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.308242.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pharmacy Drug Knowledge Assessment Pilot: Who Will Fly Farthest and What Downs the Plane?一项药房药物知识评估试点:谁能飞得最远,什么会使飞机坠毁?
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 May 13;11(3):85. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030085.
2
GenBio-MAPS as a Case Study to Understand and Address the Effects of Test-Taking Motivation in Low-Stakes Program Assessments.GenBio-MAPS 作为一个案例研究,以了解和解决低风险项目评估中考试动机的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-10-0243.
3
Using The Cancer Genome Atlas as an Inquiry Tool in the Undergraduate Classroom.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments.发展科学素养技能测试(TOSLS):测量大学生对科学信息和论点的评价。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):364-77. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
2
Vision and change in biology undergraduate education, a call for action--initial responses.生物学本科教育的愿景与变革——行动呼吁——初步回应。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Summer;9(2):71-3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-03-0044.
将癌症基因组图谱用作本科课堂的探究工具。
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 16;11:573992. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.573992. eCollection 2020.