• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对危重症儿科患者使用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的解热疗效。

Antipyretic Efficacy of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):e386-e393. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002072.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002072
PMID:31398182
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the antipyretic efficacy of acetaminophen (IV, enteral, rectal) and ibuprofen (enteral) in critically ill febrile pediatric patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Quaternary care pediatric hospital ICUs.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients less than 19 years old who were febrile (≥ 38.0°C), received a dose of IV acetaminophen, enteral acetaminophen, rectal acetaminophen, or enteral ibuprofen and had at least one temperature measurement in the following 6 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 3,341 patients (55.8% male, median age 2.5 yr [interquartile range, 0.63-9.2 yr]) met study criteria. Baseline temperature was median 38.6°C (interquartile range, 38.3-38.9°C) measured via axillary (76.9%) route. Patients became afebrile (87.5%) at median 1.4 hours (interquartile range, 0.77-2.3 hr) after the first dose of medication, a -2.9 ± 1.6% change in temperature. Antipyretic medications included as follows: enteral acetaminophen (n = 1,664), IV acetaminophen (n = 682), rectal acetaminophen (n = 637), and enteral ibuprofen (n = 358). Enteral ibuprofen had a significantly greater odds of defervescence on multivariable logistic regression analysis (p = 0.04) with a decrease of -1.97 ± 0.89°C while IV acetaminophen was significant for a decreased time to defervescence at median 1.5 hours (interquartile range 0.8-2.3 hr) after a dose (p = 0.03). Patient age, presence of obesity, and baseline temperature were significant for decreased antipyretic efficacy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral ibuprofen was the most efficacious antipyretic and IV acetaminophen had the shortest time to defervescence.

摘要

目的

确定在危重症发热儿科患者中使用对乙酰氨基酚(静脉、口服、直肠)和布洛芬(口服)的退热疗效。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置

四级儿科医院 ICU。

患者

年龄小于 19 岁的发热(≥38.0°C)患者,接受静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚、口服对乙酰氨基酚、直肠对乙酰氨基酚或口服布洛芬治疗,且在接下来的 6 小时内至少有一次体温测量。

干预

无。

测量和主要结果

共有 3341 名患者(55.8%为男性,中位年龄 2.5 岁[四分位距 0.63-9.2 岁])符合研究标准。基础体温通过腋测法测量为中位数 38.6°C(四分位距 38.3-38.9°C)。患者在首次用药后中位 1.4 小时(四分位距 0.77-2.3 小时)达到退热,体温下降-2.9±1.6%。退热药物包括:口服对乙酰氨基酚(n=1664)、静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚(n=682)、直肠对乙酰氨基酚(n=637)和口服布洛芬(n=358)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,口服布洛芬退热的可能性显著更高(p=0.04),体温下降-1.97±0.89°C,而静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在剂量后中位 1.5 小时(四分位距 0.8-2.3 小时)退热时间显著缩短(p=0.03)。患者年龄、肥胖存在和基础体温对退热疗效有显著影响(p<0.05)。

结论

口服布洛芬是最有效的解热药,而静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚退热时间最短。

相似文献

1
Antipyretic Efficacy of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.对危重症儿科患者使用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的解热疗效。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):e386-e393. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002072.
2
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of fever in hospitalized pediatric patients.一项多中心、随机、开放标签、活性对照试验,以确定静脉注射布洛芬治疗住院儿科患者发热的疗效、安全性和药代动力学。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0795-y.
3
Antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in children with febrile seizures.布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚对热性惊厥儿童的退热疗效。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Jun;149(6):632-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170190042007.
4
Determinants of antipyretic misuse in children up to 5 years of age: a cross-sectional study.5岁以下儿童退烧药误用的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):783-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.010.
5
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童采用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合及交替治疗。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):675-729. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1978.
6
Comparison of multidose ibuprofen and acetaminophen therapy in febrile children.对发热儿童进行多剂量布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗的比较。
Am J Dis Child. 1992 May;146(5):626-32. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170106025.
7
Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and placebo antipyresis in children.对乙酰氨基酚、布洛芬和安慰剂在儿童中解热作用的药代动力学-药效学整合模型
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1998 Oct;26(5):559-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1023225217108.
8
Antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen vs acetaminophen.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚的退热疗效
Am J Dis Child. 1992 May;146(5):622-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170102024.
9
Cochrane in context: Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.Cochrane背景下:对发热儿童联合及交替使用对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬治疗
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):730-2. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1979.
10
A prospective randomized study to evaluate the antipyretic effect of the combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in neurological ICU patients.一项评估乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合用于神经科重症监护病房患者的解热效果的前瞻性随机研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Dec;15(3):375-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9533-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of acute fever in children: Consensus recommendations for community and primary healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa.儿童急性发热的管理:撒哈拉以南非洲社区和初级医疗保健提供者的共识性建议
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;11(2):283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.11.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.