• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对发热儿童进行多剂量布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗的比较。

Comparison of multidose ibuprofen and acetaminophen therapy in febrile children.

作者信息

Walson P D, Galletta G, Chomilo F, Braden N J, Sawyer L A, Scheinbaum M L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University.

出版信息

Am J Dis Child. 1992 May;146(5):626-32. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170106025.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170106025
PMID:1621669
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether febrile children receiving 2.5-, 5-, or 10-mg/kg ibuprofen therapy via a liquid or 15-mg/kg acetaminophen therapy via an elixir every 6 hours for 24 to 48 hours show equivalent fever reduction or suffer adverse effects of the drug administered.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, multidose, parallel-group, variable-duration (24 to 48 hours) clinical trial.

SETTING

The academically affiliated Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

PARTICIPANTS

64 febrile (defined as oral or rectal temperature of 39 degrees C to 40.5 degrees C) but otherwise healthy children aged 6 months to 11 years 7 months randomly assigned to one of the four drug regimens.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with either ibuprofen or acetaminophen as described above. Administration of antibiotics or intravenous fluids was allowed only after at least 24 hours of treatment with the assigned drug.

MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: In 61 of the 64 evaluable patients, treatments were effective and well tolerated during the entire study. While the rates of temperature reduction and maximal reduction of fever after administration of the initial dose were equal for patients receiving 10-mg/kg ibuprofen therapy and 15-mg/kg acetaminophen therapy, and both regimens were more effective than smaller doses of ibuprofen in reducing fever, after the second dose (and continuing to the end of the study) there were no statistically significant differences in temperature response among the treatment groups. Six children were withdrawn from the study, two because of dosing errors, three because of hypothermia (temperature of less than 35.6 degrees C; all three patients were in the acetaminophen group), and one because of gastrointestinal distress (this child was in the group receiving 2.5-mg/kg ibuprofen therapy). No other significant symptoms or adverse laboratory or physical findings were noted. While further confirmatory studies are needed, ibuprofen liquid (10 mg/kg) and acetaminophen elixir (15 mg/kg) administered every 6 hours for 24 to 48 hours appeared to be most effective in reducing fever. These two regimens were equally effective and equally tolerated in febrile children. Lower ibuprofen doses (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) were less effective than acetaminophen and 10-mg/kg ibuprofen therapy after the initial dose but were at least equally effective as these two higher-dose regimens thereafter.

摘要

目的

确定发热儿童每6小时接受2.5毫克/千克、5毫克/千克或10毫克/千克布洛芬液体制剂治疗,或每6小时接受15毫克/千克对乙酰氨基酚酏剂治疗,持续24至48小时,是否能同等程度地降低体温或出现所给药的不良反应。

设计

随机、双盲、多剂量、平行组、可变持续时间(24至48小时)的临床试验。

地点

俄亥俄州哥伦布市一所大学附属医院的儿童医院。

参与者

64名发热(定义为口腔或直肠温度39摄氏度至40.5摄氏度)但其他方面健康的6个月至11岁7个月大的儿童,随机分配到四种药物治疗方案中的一种。

干预措施

如上所述用布洛芬或对乙酰氨基酚治疗。仅在使用指定药物治疗至少24小时后才允许使用抗生素或静脉输液。

测量指标/主要结果:在64名可评估患者中的61名中,整个研究期间治疗有效且耐受性良好。接受10毫克/千克布洛芬治疗和15毫克/千克对乙酰氨基酚治疗的患者,初始剂量给药后的体温降低率和最大退热幅度相同,且两种治疗方案在退热方面均比小剂量布洛芬更有效,但在第二次给药后(直至研究结束),各治疗组之间的体温反应无统计学显著差异。6名儿童退出研究,2名因给药错误,3名因体温过低(体温低于35.6摄氏度;所有3名患者均在对乙酰氨基酚组),1名因胃肠道不适(该儿童在接受2.5毫克/千克布洛芬治疗组)。未观察到其他显著症状或不良实验室检查结果或体格检查发现。虽然需要进一步的验证性研究,但每6小时给予布洛芬液体制剂(10毫克/千克)和对乙酰氨基酚酏剂(15毫克/千克),持续24至48小时,似乎在降低体温方面最有效。这两种治疗方案在发热儿童中效果相同且耐受性相同。较低剂量的布洛芬(2.5毫克/千克和5毫克/千克)在初始剂量后不如对乙酰氨基酚和10毫克/千克布洛芬治疗有效,但此后至少与这两种高剂量方案效果相同。

相似文献

1
Comparison of multidose ibuprofen and acetaminophen therapy in febrile children.对发热儿童进行多剂量布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗的比较。
Am J Dis Child. 1992 May;146(5):626-32. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170106025.
2
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童采用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合及交替治疗。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):675-729. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1978.
3
Cochrane in context: Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.Cochrane背景下:对发热儿童联合及交替使用对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬治疗
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):730-2. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1979.
4
Antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen vs acetaminophen.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚的退热疗效
Am J Dis Child. 1992 May;146(5):622-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170102024.
5
Antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in children with febrile seizures.布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚对热性惊厥儿童的退热疗效。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Jun;149(6):632-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170190042007.
6
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童联合及交替使用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD009572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009572.pub2.
7
Antipyretic treatment in young children with fever: acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or both alternating in a randomized, double-blind study.幼儿发热的退热治疗:对乙酰氨基酚、布洛芬或两者交替使用的随机双盲研究。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Feb;160(2):197-202. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.197.
8
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of fever in hospitalized pediatric patients.一项多中心、随机、开放标签、活性对照试验,以确定静脉注射布洛芬治疗住院儿科患者发热的疗效、安全性和药代动力学。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0795-y.
9
Ketoprofen versus paracetamol (acetaminophen) or ibuprofen in the management of fever: results of two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, repeated-dose, multicentre, phase III studies in children.酮洛芬对比扑热息痛(对乙酰氨基酚)或布洛芬用于儿童发热的管理:两项随机、双盲、双模拟、平行分组、重复剂量、多中心、III 期研究的结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(6):375-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03256907.
10
Alternating ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the treatment of febrile children: a pilot study [ISRCTN30487061].布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚交替使用治疗发热儿童:一项初步研究[ISRCTN30487061]
BMC Med. 2006 Mar 4;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of acetaminophen and ibuprofen monotherapy in febrile children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬单一疗法治疗发热儿童的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Aug 22;18(4):965-981. doi: 10.5114/aoms/140875. eCollection 2022.
2
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) use in infants and children was never shown to be safe for neurodevelopment: a systematic review with citation tracking.对婴儿和儿童使用扑热息痛(对乙酰氨基酚)从未被证明对神经发育是安全的:一项有引文追踪的系统评价。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 May;181(5):1835-1857. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04407-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
Paracetamol (acetaminophen): A familiar drug with an unexplained mechanism of action.
对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛):一种作用机制不明的常见药物。
Temperature (Austin). 2021 Mar 16;8(4):351-371. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2021.1886392. eCollection 2021.
4
Symptomatic fever management in children: A systematic review of national and international guidelines.儿童有症状发热的管理:国家和国际指南的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0245815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245815. eCollection 2021.
5
The antipyretic efficacy and safety of propacetamol compared with dexibuprofen in febrile children: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative, phase 3 clinical trial.对乙酰氨基酚与右布洛芬在发热儿童中的退热疗效及安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照、3期临床试验
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 23;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1166-z.
6
Accuracy of acetaminophen dosing in children by caregivers in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯护理人员给儿童服用对乙酰氨基酚剂量的准确性。
Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):513-7. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.84630.
7
Efficacy of standard doses of Ibuprofen alone, alternating, and combined with acetaminophen for the treatment of febrile children.标准剂量布洛芬单药、交替用药和与对乙酰氨基酚联合治疗发热儿童的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.006.
8
Acetaminophen and ibuprofen in the management of fever and mild to moderate pain in children.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬用于儿童发热及轻至中度疼痛的治疗
Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Jul;3(4):246-50. doi: 10.1093/pch/3.4.246.
9
Ibuprofen: pharmacology, efficacy and safety.布洛芬:药理学、疗效和安全性。
Inflammopharmacology. 2009 Dec;17(6):275-342. doi: 10.1007/s10787-009-0016-x. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
10
Intramuscular Dipyrone versus Oral Ibuprofen or Nimesulide for Reduction of Fever in the Outpatient Setting.肌内注射双氯芬酸与口服布洛芬或尼美舒利在门诊环境中退热的比较。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(8):519-26. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323080-00004.