Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Dec;15(3):375-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9533-8.
To compare the antipyretic effect of simultaneously administered acetaminophen (APAP) plus ibuprofen (IBU) to either APAP or IBU alone in critically ill febrile neurological and neurosurgical patients.
This is a prospective, three-armed, randomized controlled trial of 79 patients in the neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit (NNICU) of a tertiary care academic hospital. Eligible patients who developed a temperature ≥38°C were randomized to receive either a single dose of APAP 975 mg, a single dose of IBU 800 mg, or a combination of both (APAP + IBU). Oral temperatures were measured hourly for 6 h following medication administration.
All three treatments decreased temperature over the 6-h period. The area under the curve (AUC) for ΔT for APAP was -3.55°C-h (95% CI -4.75 to -2.34°C-h); for IBU was -4.05°C-h (95% CI -5.16 to -2.94°C-h); and for the combination of APAP and IBU was -5.10°C-h (95% CI -6.20 to -4.01°C-h). The differences in AUC between the groups were as follows: IBU versus APAP = -0.50°C-h (P = 0.28), APAP + IBU versus IBU = -1.05°C-h (P = 0.09), and APAP + IBU versus APAP = -1.56°C-h (P = 0.03).
The combination of IBU and APAP produces significantly greater fever control than APAP alone, with trends favoring the combination over IBU alone and IBU over APAP alone.
比较同时给予对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)加布洛芬(IBU)与单独给予 APAP 或 IBU 在重症发热神经和神经外科患者中的退热效果。
这是一项在三级学术医院神经科/神经外科重症监护病房(NNICU)进行的前瞻性、三臂、随机对照试验,纳入了 79 名出现体温≥38°C 的患者。符合条件的患者随机接受单剂量 APAP 975mg、单剂量 IBU 800mg 或两者联合(APAP+IBU)。给药后每小时测量口腔温度,持续 6 小时。
三种治疗方法均在 6 小时内降低体温。APAP 的ΔT 曲线下面积(AUC)为-3.55°C-h(95%CI-4.75 至-2.34°C-h);IBU 为-4.05°C-h(95%CI-5.16 至-2.94°C-h);APAP 和 IBU 联合治疗为-5.10°C-h(95%CI-6.20 至-4.01°C-h)。组间 AUC 的差异如下:IBU 与 APAP 相比=-0.50°C-h(P=0.28),APAP+IBU 与 IBU 相比=-1.05°C-h(P=0.09),APAP+IBU 与 APAP 相比=-1.56°C-h(P=0.03)。
与单独使用 APAP 相比,IBU 和 APAP 的联合使用可显著更好地控制发热,且联合使用的趋势优于单独使用 IBU 和单独使用 APAP。