• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 STROBE 声明:调查结果强调了期刊在执行报告指南方面的作用。

Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines.

机构信息

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France.

Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.019
PMID:31398440
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to identify factors affecting the use of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, specifically authors' attitudes toward and experiences with it.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

An online survey was distributed to authors of observational studies recruited via social media, personal network snowballing, and mass mailings using targeted search strategies. Data on demographics, awareness, motivators, and usage were collected in conjunction with a modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) scale on which confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed.

RESULTS

One thousand fifteen participants completed the survey. Of these, 185 (18.2%) indicated they had never heard of STROBE nor used it previously, 195 (19.2%) had heard of it but never used it, and 635 (62.6%) had used it. Journals promoting STROBE were both key motivators and awareness mechanisms; peers and educational workshops were also important influencing factors to a lesser degree. The internal consistency of the modified UTAUT scale was strong (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). CFA supported a four-factor model with 23 questions.

CONCLUSION

The endorsement of STROBE by journals is key to authors' awareness and use of the guideline. We tested and validated our scale which can guide future research on reporting guidelines.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定影响《流行病学观察研究报告强化指南》(STROBE)使用的因素,特别是作者对其的态度和使用经验。

研究设计与设置

采用在线问卷调查方式,通过社交媒体、个人网络雪球效应以及使用目标搜索策略的群发邮件,招募观察性研究的作者参与调查。收集人口统计学数据、意识、动机和使用情况,并结合修正后的统一技术接受和使用理论(UTAUT)量表进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。

结果

共有 1015 名参与者完成了调查。其中,185 名(18.2%)表示从未听说过 STROBE,也从未使用过;195 名(19.2%)听说过但从未使用过;635 名(62.6%)曾使用过。推广 STROBE 的期刊是其主要的激励因素和意识机制;同行和教育性工作坊也是较小程度上的重要影响因素。修正后的 UTAUT 量表的内部一致性很强(Cronbach's alpha=0.94)。CFA 支持具有 23 个问题的四因素模型。

结论

期刊对 STROBE 的认可对作者对指南的认识和使用至关重要。我们对量表进行了测试和验证,这可以指导未来对报告指南的研究。

相似文献

1
Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines.采用 STROBE 声明:调查结果强调了期刊在执行报告指南方面的作用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value.关于 STROBE 声明的在线调查突出了对其内容、目的和价值的不同看法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
3
Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement.制定《加强流行病学观察性研究报告 - 兽医版(STROBE-Vet)声明》的方法和过程。
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Nov;30(6):1887-1895. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14574. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
4
A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions.一项横断面文献计量学研究表明,STROBE 及其扩展的期刊认可度不高。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;107:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
5
Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.《STROBE-Vet声明解释与阐述文件:加强兽医学流行病学观察性研究报告》
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Nov;30(6):1896-1928. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14592. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
6
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement.加强流行病学观察性研究报告——营养流行病学(STROBE-nut):STROBE声明的扩展
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 7;13(6):e1002036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002036. eCollection 2016 Jun.
7
[Adherence to research reporting guidelines in biomedical journals in Latin America and the Caribbean].[拉丁美洲和加勒比地区生物医学期刊对研究报告指南的遵循情况]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Oct;36(4):232-7.
8
Evaluation of the Endorsement of the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) Statement on the Reporting Quality of Published Genetic Association Studies.《加强遗传关联研究报告(STREGA)声明》对已发表遗传关联研究报告质量的认可评估
J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 5;26(8):399-404. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150173. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
9
Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology - veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement.制定加强流行病学观察性研究报告 - 兽医版(STROBE-Vet)声明的方法和过程。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Nov 1;134:188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.005.
10
The reporting quality of observational studies relevant to the STROBE-nut statement in journals of nutrition.与营养学期刊中 STROBE-nut 声明相关的观察性研究的报告质量。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2021;30(1):174-183. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202103_30(1).0020.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of health equity considerations in equity-relevant observational studies: Protocol for a systematic assessment.在与公平性相关的观察性研究中报告健康公平性考量因素:一项系统评估方案
F1000Res. 2022 Jun 6;11:615. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122185.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Global research trends in liver regeneration and immunomodulation: A perspective from bibliometric analysis.肝脏再生与免疫调节的全球研究趋势:文献计量学分析视角
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2524249. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2524249. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
Comparative study of postpartum sexual function: Second-degree tears versus episiotomy outcomes.
产后性功能比较研究:二度撕裂与会阴切开术结局比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2761-2769. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07494-2. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
4
Reporting of equity in observational epidemiology: A methodological review.观察性流行病学中股权报告:方法学综述。
J Glob Health. 2024 Mar 1;14:04046. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04046.
5
Commentary: Determinants of quality of life and treatment satisfaction in dual-diagnosis patients.评论:双重诊断患者生活质量和治疗满意度的决定因素
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1173253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173253. eCollection 2023.
6
Improving social justice in observational studies: protocol for the development of a global and Indigenous STROBE-equity reporting guideline.改善观察性研究中的社会公平性:制定全球和本土 STROBE 公平报告指南的方案。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 30;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01854-1.
7
Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines.研究的透明度:对各学科作者、评审员和编辑的调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 8;18(3):e0270054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270054. eCollection 2023.
8
Pulmonary function and medication effect in mild-stage subjects with Parkinson's disease.轻度帕金森病患者的肺功能和药物疗效。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 Dec;80(12):1233-1238. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758753. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Ossification of the posterior capitellum: description of a new pathology and its radiological appearance.后髁骨化:一种新病理学及其放射学表现的描述。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4019-4029. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04689-7. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
10
Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol.观察性研究中报告健康公平性相关内容的指南:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e056875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056875.