Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1775 Aurora Ct, MSA140, Bldg 20, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 8;20(16):3857. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163857.
Islet autoantibody (iAb)-positive individuals have a high risk of progression to type 1 diabetes (T1D), although the rate of progression is highly variable and factors involved in the rate of progression are largely unknown. The ratio of unmethylated/methylated insulin DNA levels (unmethylated ratio) has been shown to be higher in participants at high risk of T1D compared to healthy controls. We aimed to evaluate whether an unmethylated ratio may be a useful biomarker of beta cell death and rate of progression to T1D. In TrialNet participants who were followed in the Pathway to Prevention Study and progressed to diabetes ( = 57, median age of onset 15.3 years), we measured unmethylated ratio and autoantibodies by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assays (ECL-IAA, ECL-GADA, and ECL-IA2) and radioimmunoassays (RIA) (mIAA, GADA, IA2A, and ZnT8A) longitudinally for 24 months prior to diagnosis. Linear models were used to test the association between unmethylated ratio and the age at T1D diagnosis and unmethylated ratio and iAb over time. Close to diabetes onset, the unmethylated ratio was associated with mIAA ( = 0.003), ECL-IAA ( = 0.002), and IA2A ( = 0.01) levels, but not with GADA, ECL-GADA, ECL-IA2, or ZnT8A levels. No significant associations were found at baseline (24 months prior to T1D diagnosis). Only mIAA levels were significantly associated with an unmethylated ratio over time, with a 0.24 change in the ratio for each 0.1 change in mIAA z-score ( = 0.02). Adjusting for a baseline unmethylated ratio, an increased rate of change in unmethylated ratio from baseline to diabetes onset was associated with a five-year decrease in age at T1D diagnosis ( = 0.04).
胰岛自身抗体 (iAb) 阳性个体发生 1 型糖尿病 (T1D) 的风险较高,尽管进展速度高度可变,且目前尚不清楚与进展速度相关的因素。与健康对照组相比,T1D 高危人群的胰岛素 DNA 未甲基化/甲基化水平比值(未甲基化比值)更高。我们旨在评估未甲基化比值是否可作为胰岛细胞死亡和向 T1D 进展的有用生物标志物。在参与预防路径研究并进展为糖尿病的 TrialNet 参与者中(n=57,发病中位年龄 15.3 岁),我们通过电化学发光 (ECL) 测定法(ECL-IAA、ECL-GADA 和 ECL-IA2)和放射免疫分析法(RIA)(mIAA、GADA、IA2A 和 ZnT8A)测量了未甲基化比值和自身抗体,在诊断前 24 个月进行了纵向测量。线性模型用于检验未甲基化比值与 T1D 发病年龄之间的关联以及未甲基化比值与 iAb 随时间的变化。在接近发病时,未甲基化比值与 mIAA(=0.003)、ECL-IAA(=0.002)和 IA2A(=0.01)水平相关,但与 GADA、ECL-GADA、ECL-IA2 或 ZnT8A 水平无关。在基线(T1D 诊断前 24 个月)时未发现显著关联。仅 mIAA 水平与未甲基化比值随时间呈显著相关,mIAA z 评分每增加 0.1,比值变化 0.24(=0.02)。调整基线未甲基化比值后,从基线到发病的未甲基化比值变化率增加与 T1D 发病年龄减少五年相关(=0.04)。