Improved survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients with unresectable lung metastases.

BACKGROUND

Modern systemic therapies considerably improve tumour control and thus open the possibility of new surgical approaches in metastatic colorectal cancer. In this retrospective clinical cohort with a comparison group, we investigated whether liver resection in a combined liver-lung-metastasised stage is justified if pulmonary disease is not resected.

METHODS

From 283 patients treated in our institution between 2000 and 2014 for combined colorectal liver- and lung metastases, 35 patients had their pulmonary metastases left in situ while they were eligible for both treatment options: resection versus non-resection of liver metastases. Effectively, 15 of these patients received whereas 20 did not receive a liver resection. In these patients, we compared overall survival and determined risk factors that are associated with poor survival, applying a Cox-Proportional Hazards model.

RESULTS

Patients whose liver metastases were resected showed significantly longer median survival compared to patients who did not undergo hepatic surgery (median 2.6 vs 1.5 years, P = 0.0182). The Cox-Proportional Hazards model revealed hepatic metastasectomy to be the strongest determinant of patient survival (HR 5.27; CI: (1.89, 14.65)).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that surgical removal of liver metastases may be beneficial in selected patients even if concomitant lung metastases cannot be resected.