Saelim Kantara, Chavananon Shevachut, Ruangnapa Kanokpan, Prasertsan Pharsai, Anuntaseree Wanaporn
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2019 Sep;8(3):156-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678730. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Appropriate sedation in mechanically ventilated patients is important to facilitate adequate respiratory support and maintain patient safety. However, the optimal sedation protocol for children is unclear. This study assessed the effectiveness of a sedation protocol utilizing the COMFORT-B sedation scale in reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in children. This was a nonrandomized prospective cohort study compared with a historical control. The prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2015 and August 2016 and included 58 mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). All patients received protocolized sedation utilizing the COMFORT-B scale, which was assessed every 12 hours after intubation by a single assessor. The prospective data were compared with retrospective data of 58 mechanically ventilated patients who received sedation by usual care from November 2014 to August 2015. Fifty percent of 116 patients were male and the mean age was 22 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.6-68.4). Patients in the intervention group showed no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation (median 4.5 [IQR: 2.2-10.5] vs. 5 [IQR: 3-8.8] days). Also, there were no significant differences in the PICU length of stay (LOS; median 7 vs. 7 days, = 0.59) and hospital LOS (median 18 vs. 14 days, = 0.14) between the intervention and control groups. The percentages of sedative drugs, including fentanyl, morphine, and midazolam, in each group were not statistically different. The COMFORT-B scale with protocolized sedation in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients in the PICU did not reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation compared with usual care.
对机械通气患者进行适当的镇静对于促进充分的呼吸支持和维持患者安全很重要。然而,儿童的最佳镇静方案尚不清楚。本研究评估了使用COMFORT - B镇静量表的镇静方案在缩短儿童机械通气时间方面的有效性。这是一项与历史对照相比的非随机前瞻性队列研究。前瞻性队列研究于2015年11月至2016年8月进行,纳入了58名入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的机械通气患者。所有患者均采用基于COMFORT - B量表的标准化镇静方案,插管后每12小时由一名评估者进行评估。将前瞻性数据与2014年11月至2015年8月接受常规护理镇静的58名机械通气患者的回顾性数据进行比较。116名患者中有50%为男性,平均年龄为22个月(四分位间距[IQR]:6.6 - 68.4)。干预组患者的机械通气时间无差异(中位数4.5天[IQR:2.2 - 10.5] vs. 5天[IQR:3 - 8.8])。此外,干预组和对照组之间在PICU住院时间(LOS;中位数7天 vs. 7天,P = 0.59)和医院住院时间(中位数18天 vs. 14天,P = 0.14)方面也没有显著差异。每组中包括芬太尼、吗啡和咪达唑仑在内的镇静药物百分比无统计学差异。与常规护理相比,PICU中对机械通气儿科患者采用基于COMFORT - B量表的标准化镇静方案并未缩短机械通气时间。