Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Abington, the Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and the Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;134(3):559-569. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003401.
To evaluate the effects of race and insurance status on the use of brachytherapy for treatment of cervical cancer.
This is a retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database. We identified 25,223 patients diagnosed with stage IB2 through IVA cervical cancer who received radiation therapy during their primary treatment from 2004 to 2015. A univariate analysis was used to assess covariate association with brachytherapy. A multivariable regression model was used to evaluate the effect of race and insurance status on rates of brachytherapy treatment. The Cox proportional hazards model and the multiplicative hazard model were used to evaluate overall survival. P<.05 indicated a statistically significant difference for comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes.
Non-Hispanic black patients received brachytherapy at a significantly lower rate than non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-0.99; P=.036); Hispanic (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.02; P=.115) and Asian (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.99-1.29; P=.074) patients received brachytherapy at similar rates. Compared with patients with private insurance, those who were uninsured (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.65-0.79; P<.001), had Medicaid (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89; P<.001) or Medicare insurance (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78-0.92; P<.001) were less likely to receive brachytherapy. Brachytherapy was not found to be a mediator of race and insurance-related disparities in overall survival.
Racial and insurance disparities exist for those who receive brachytherapy, with many patients not receiving the standard of care, but overall survival was not affected.
评估种族和保险状况对宫颈癌近距离放射治疗应用的影响。
这是一项国家癌症数据库的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了 2004 年至 2015 年期间在初次治疗中接受放射治疗且诊断为 IB2 期至 IVA 期宫颈癌的 25223 例患者。采用单变量分析评估与近距离放射治疗相关的协变量。采用多变量回归模型评估种族和保险状况对接受近距离放射治疗的概率的影响。采用 Cox 比例风险模型和乘法风险模型评估总生存率。P<.05 表示主要和次要结局比较的统计学差异。
与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,非西班牙裔黑人患者接受近距离放射治疗的比例明显较低(比值比[OR]0.93;95%CI0.86-0.99;P=.036);西班牙裔(OR0.93;95%CI0.85-1.02;P=.115)和亚裔(OR1.13;95%CI0.99-1.29;P=.074)患者接受近距离放射治疗的比例相似。与拥有私人保险的患者相比,未参保(OR0.72;95%CI0.65-0.79;P<.001)、拥有医疗补助(OR0.83;95%CI0.77-0.89;P<.001)或医疗保险(OR0.85;95%CI0.78-0.92;P<.001)的患者接受近距离放射治疗的可能性较低。近距离放射治疗并不是造成种族和保险相关的总体生存率差异的中介因素。
接受近距离放射治疗的患者存在种族和保险差异,许多患者未接受标准治疗,但总体生存率未受影响。