Balmer Dorene F, Gottlieb-Smith Rachel J, Hobday Patricia M, Long Michele, Carraccio Carol, Bale James F, Lane J Lindsey
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (DF Balmer, RJG Smith), Philadelphia, Pa; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (DF Balmer), Philadelphia, Pa.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (DF Balmer, RJG Smith), Philadelphia, Pa.
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jan-Feb;20(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
Research on how medical students choose a career in pediatrics is either dated or conflated with primary care career choice. Capitalizing on student participation in an innovative, time-variable, competency based pathway program, Education in Pediatrics Across the Continuum (EPAC), the authors explored the process of career decision-making in students at 5 medical schools (including 4 EPAC sites) who begin medical school with an interest in pediatrics.
Individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with students in 5 groups: Group 1: accepted into EPAC, n = 8; Group 2: accepted into EPAC, opted-out, n = 4; Group 3 applied to EPAC, not accepted, pursued pediatrics, n = 4; Group 4: applied to EPAC, not accepted, did not pursue pediatrics, n = 3; Group 5: pursued pediatrics at a non-EPAC site, n = 6. Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively, with inductive coding of data revealing patterns in data explored in subsequent interviews and refined in the final analysis.
All students described intrinsic guiding principles, that is, "doing what you love," that attracted them to pediatrics. They described extrinsic, phase-specific experiences before medical school, before clerkship, and in clerkship that shaped their perceptions of a career in pediatrics and shed light on collective values of different specialties. Student's assessment of how their guiding principles aligned with the collective values of pediatrics, which students encountered in the clerkship phase, was a key to making career decisions.
Intrinsic and extrinsic factors do not act alone but interact in clerkships, and influence career choice of students who enter medical school with an interest in pediatrics.
关于医学生如何选择儿科职业的研究要么过时,要么与初级保健职业选择混为一谈。利用学生参与一项创新的、基于时间变量和能力的途径项目——“连续统一体中的儿科教育”(EPAC),作者探讨了5所医学院(包括4个EPAC站点)中那些带着对儿科的兴趣开始医学院学习的学生的职业决策过程。
对5组学生进行了个人半结构化访谈:第1组:被EPAC录取,n = 8;第2组:被EPAC录取但退出,n = 4;第3组:申请EPAC但未被录取,仍选择儿科,n = 4;第4组:申请EPAC但未被录取,未选择儿科,n = 3;第5组:在非EPAC站点选择儿科,n = 6。数据收集和分析反复进行,对数据进行归纳编码,揭示后续访谈中探讨的数据模式,并在最终分析中进行完善。
所有学生都描述了吸引他们投身儿科的内在指导原则,即“做自己喜欢的事”。他们描述了医学院前、见习前和见习期间的外在、特定阶段的经历,这些经历塑造了他们对儿科职业的看法,并揭示了不同专业的共同价值观。学生对其指导原则与在见习阶段遇到的儿科共同价值观的契合度的评估,是做出职业决策的关键。
内在因素和外在因素并非单独起作用,而是在见习期间相互作用,并影响那些带着对儿科的兴趣进入医学院的学生的职业选择。