Oderberg David S
Department of Philosophy, University of Reading , Reading , UK.
New Bioeth. 2019 Sep;25(3):207-220. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2019.1651078. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
The vigorous legal and ethical debates over conscientious objection have taken place largely within the domain of health care. Is this because conscience in medicine is of a special kind, or are there other reasons why it tends to dominate these debates? Beginning with an analysis of the analogy between medical conscience and conscientious objection in wartime, I go on to examine various possible grounds for distinguishing between medicine and other professional contexts (taking law and accountancy as examples). The conclusion is that no difference exists between the military and medical cases, nor between the health professions and other professions. Nevertheless, there are reasons why medical conscience has distinctive importance, mainly concerning the rapid advance of medical technology. Medical conscience will, for these reasons, continue to drive the debate over conscientious objection, even though legal protection should in principle extend to all professions.
围绕依良心拒行的激烈法律和伦理辩论主要发生在医疗保健领域。这是因为医学中的良心具有特殊性质,还是存在其他原因导致它往往主导这些辩论呢?从分析医疗良心与战时依良心拒服兵役之间的类比开始,我接着考察区分医学与其他专业领域(以法律和会计为例)的各种可能依据。结论是,军事和医疗案例之间、卫生专业与其他专业之间不存在差异。然而,医疗良心具有独特重要性是有原因的,主要涉及医疗技术的迅速发展。基于这些原因,医疗良心将继续推动围绕依良心拒行的辩论,尽管原则上法律保护应扩展到所有专业。