• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中的良心拒绝:专业职责论点为何站不住脚。

Conscientious Objection in Health Care: Why the Professional Duty Argument is Unconvincing.

机构信息

Australia Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2022 Nov 5;47(4):549-557. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhac013.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhac013
PMID:35920746
Abstract

The past decade has seen a burgeoning of scholarly interest in conscientious objection in health care. Specifically, several commentators have discussed the implications that conscientious objection has for the delivery of timely, efficient, and nondiscriminatory medical care. In this paper, I discuss the main argument put forward by the most prominent critics of conscientious objection-what I call the Professional Duty Argument or PDA. According to proponents of PDA, doctors should place patients' well-being and rights at the center of their professional practice. Doctors should be prepared to set their personal moral or religious beliefs aside where these beliefs conflict with what is legal and considered good medical practice by relevant professional associations. Conscientious objection, on this account, should be heavily restricted, if even allowed at all. I discuss two powerful objections against PDA. The first objection, which I call the fallibility objection, notes that law and professional codes of conduct are fallible guides for ethical conduct and that conscientious objection has in the past and continues today to provide a check on aberrations in law and professional convention. The second, which I call the professional discretion objection, states that restrictions on conscientious objection undermine one of the cornerstones of good medical practice, namely, a practitioner's right to independent professional judgment. I argue that these two objections give us reason to retain conscience clauses in professional codes of conduct.

摘要

过去十年中,学术界对医疗保健中的良心拒绝对健康护理的兴趣日益浓厚。具体来说,有几位评论家讨论了良心拒绝对及时、高效和无歧视医疗服务的影响。在本文中,我将讨论最著名的良心拒绝对手提出的主要论点——我称之为专业职责论点或 PDA。根据 PDA 的支持者的说法,医生应该将患者的福祉和权利置于专业实践的中心。医生应该准备好将自己的个人道德或宗教信仰放在一边,只要这些信仰与相关专业协会所规定的法律和良好医疗实践相冲突。在这种情况下,应该严格限制或甚至不允许良心拒绝对抗。我将讨论反对 PDA 的两个强有力的反对意见。第一个反对意见,我称之为易错性反对意见,指出法律和专业行为准则是道德行为的易错指南,而且良心拒绝对过去和现在都提供了对法律和专业惯例的偏差的检查。第二个,我称之为专业裁量权反对意见,指出对良心拒绝对健康护理的限制破坏了良好医疗实践的基石之一,即从业者独立专业判断的权利。我认为,这两个反对意见使我们有理由在专业行为准则中保留良心条款。

相似文献

1
Conscientious Objection in Health Care: Why the Professional Duty Argument is Unconvincing.医疗保健中的良心拒绝:专业职责论点为何站不住脚。
J Med Philos. 2022 Nov 5;47(4):549-557. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhac013.
2
Objection to Conscience: An Argument Against Conscience Exemptions in Healthcare.对良知的异议:反对医疗保健中的良知豁免权的论点。
Bioethics. 2017 Jun;31(5):400-408. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12333. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Three Arguments Against Institutional Conscientious Objection, and Why They Are (Metaphysically) Unconvincing.反对制度性良心反对的三个论点,以及为什么它们(在形而上学上)没有说服力。
J Med Philos. 2024 Apr 20;49(3):298-312. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhae012.
4
The paradox of conscientious objection and the anemic concept of 'conscience': downplaying the role of moral integrity in health care.良心拒服兵役的悖论与苍白的“良心”概念:淡化道德操守在医疗保健中的作用。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2014 Jun;24(2):159-85. doi: 10.1353/ken.2014.0011.
5
Conscientious Objection: Understanding the Right of Conscience in Health and Healthcare Practice.良心拒斥:理解健康与医疗实践中的良心权利
New Bioeth. 2016 Apr;22(1):33-44. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2016.1151252.
6
Conscientious objection, professional duty and compromise: A response to Savulescu and Schuklenk.出于良心的反对、职业责任与妥协:对萨夫勒斯库和舒克莱恩克的回应。
Bioethics. 2018 Feb;32(2):126-131. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12410. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
7
The no correlation argument: can the morality of conscientious objection be empirically supported? the Italian case.无关联论点:依良心拒服兵役的道德性能否得到实证支持?意大利的情况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 21;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0221-x.
8
Conscientious Objection and Clinical Judgement: The Right to Refuse to Harm.良心拒绝与临床判断:拒绝伤害的权利。
New Bioeth. 2019 Sep;25(3):248-261. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2019.1649863.
9
Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons.助产士和护士出于良心拒接参与堕胎工作:原因的系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 27;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0268-3.
10
Quotas: Enabling Conscientious Objection to Coexist with Abortion Access.配额制:使出于良心拒行堕胎与堕胎可及性共存。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Jun;29(2):154-169. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00419-5. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Conscientious objection in euthanasia and assisted suicide: A systematic review.安乐死和协助自杀中的良心拒斥:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326142. eCollection 2025.
2
Development, reliability, and validity of the nurses' conscientious objection attitude scale (COAS-N).护士良心拒服态度量表(COAS-N)的编制、信效度研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01155-4.
3
Current Challenges for Conscientious Objection by Physicians in Spain.西班牙医生依良心拒医面临的当前挑战。
Linacre Q. 2024 Feb;91(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/00243639231184352. Epub 2023 Aug 10.