Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
History of Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Oct;2(10):726-734. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Gender diversity has the potential to drive scientific discovery and innovation. Here, we distinguish three approaches to gender diversity: diversity in research teams, diversity in research methods and diversity in research questions. While gender diversity is commonly understood to refer only to the gender composition of research teams, fully realizing the potential of diversity for science and innovation also requires attention to the methods employed and questions raised in scientific knowledge-making. We provide a framework for understanding the best ways to support the three approaches to gender diversity across four interdependent domains - from research teams to the broader disciplines in which they are embedded to research organizations and ultimately to the different societies that shape them through specific gender norms and policies. Our analysis demonstrates that realizing the benefits of diversity for science requires careful management of these four interdependent domains.
性别多样性有可能推动科学发现和创新。在这里,我们将性别多样性分为三种方法:研究团队的多样性、研究方法的多样性和研究问题的多样性。虽然性别多样性通常被理解为仅指研究团队的性别构成,但要充分发挥多样性在科学和创新方面的潜力,还需要关注科学知识创造中所采用的方法和提出的问题。我们提供了一个框架,用于理解在四个相互依存的领域中支持三种性别多样性方法的最佳方式——从研究团队到他们所嵌入的更广泛学科,再到研究组织,最终到通过特定性别规范和政策塑造他们的不同社会。我们的分析表明,要实现多样性对科学的益处,需要精心管理这四个相互依存的领域。