• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别多样化的团队能产生更多新颖且影响深远的科学理念。

Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas.

机构信息

Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.

Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems and Data Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 6;119(36):e2200841119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200841119. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2200841119
PMID:36037387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9456721/
Abstract

Science's changing demographics raise new questions about research team diversity and research outcomes. We study mixed-gender research teams, examining 6.6 million papers published across the medical sciences since 2000 and establishing several core findings. First, the fraction of publications by mixed-gender teams has grown rapidly, yet mixed-gender teams continue to be underrepresented compared to the expectations of a null model. Second, despite their underrepresentation, the publications of mixed-gender teams are substantially more novel and impactful than the publications of same-gender teams of equivalent size. Third, the greater the gender balance on a team, the better the team scores on these performance measures. Fourth, these patterns generalize across medical subfields. Finally, the novelty and impact advantages seen with mixed-gender teams persist when considering numerous controls and potential related features, including fixed effects for the individual researchers, team structures, and network positioning, suggesting that a team's gender balance is an underrecognized yet powerful correlate of novel and impactful scientific discoveries.

摘要

科学领域的人口结构变化引发了新的问题,即研究团队的多样性与研究成果之间的关系。我们研究了男女混合的研究团队,考察了 2000 年以来发表在医学科学领域的 660 万篇论文,并得出了一些核心发现。首先,男女混合团队发表的论文比例增长迅速,但与零模型的预期相比,男女混合团队的代表性仍然不足。其次,尽管代表性不足,但与同等规模的同性团队相比,男女混合团队的出版物在新颖性和影响力方面都有显著提高。第三,团队的性别平衡程度越高,团队在这些绩效指标上的得分就越好。第四,这些模式在医学各子领域中普遍存在。最后,即使考虑到许多控制变量和潜在相关特征,包括对个别研究人员、团队结构和网络定位的固定效应,男女混合团队在新颖性和影响力方面的优势仍然存在,这表明团队的性别平衡是一个尚未被充分认识但却具有强大影响力的科学发现相关因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/726146a404d4/pnas.2200841119fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/c5bb54af9586/pnas.2200841119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/6d1f77930761/pnas.2200841119fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/726146a404d4/pnas.2200841119fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/c5bb54af9586/pnas.2200841119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/6d1f77930761/pnas.2200841119fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d2/9456721/726146a404d4/pnas.2200841119fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas.性别多样化的团队能产生更多新颖且影响深远的科学理念。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 6;119(36):e2200841119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200841119. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Analysis of justification for author order and gender bias in author order among those contributing equally.并列贡献作者署名顺序和性别偏见的正当性分析。
mBio. 2024 May 8;15(5):e0064624. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00646-24. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
4
Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation.实现性别多样性,促进科学发现和创新。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Oct;2(10):726-734. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications.大学科研团队规模与内部合作出版物:科学政策影响
Scientometrics. 2022;127(12):6993-7013. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04285-x. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
6
Flat teams drive scientific innovation.扁平化团队推动科学创新。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 7;119(23):e2200927119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200927119. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.流动性与国际合作:以墨西哥海外科学人才为例。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0126720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126720. eCollection 2015.
8
[Scientific activity of the most productive Spanish research teams in pharmacology and pharmacy during the period 1986-1993 as covered by the Science Citation Index (SCI)].[科学引文索引(SCI)涵盖的1986 - 1993年期间西班牙药理学和药学领域最具生产力的研究团队的科研活动]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Oct 24;111(13):489-95.
9
Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences.由于英语在科学领域的主导地位而导致的科学论文编写和发表方面的劣势:以哥伦比亚生物科学研究人员为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238372. eCollection 2020.
10
Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.影响医学研究中性别报告的因素:跨学科文献计量分析。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):550-559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32995-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Intercultural Competence of Faculty in Academic Medicine and Health Professions: Concepts and Metrics.评估医学与健康专业学院教师的跨文化能力:概念与指标
J Health Equity. 2025;2(1). doi: 10.1080/29944694.2025.2485439. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Toward a Beautiful Amalgam: The Necessity of Heterogeneity in RNA Science and Research Culture.迈向美好的融合:RNA科学与研究文化中异质性的必要性。
ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2025 Jul 12;5(4):519-530. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.5c00114. eCollection 2025 Aug 20.
3
Unpacking gender discrepancies in academic promotion across STEM fields in Mexico.

本文引用的文献

1
Public use and public funding of science.科学的公共使用和公共资助。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;6(10):1344-1350. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01397-5. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Women are credited less in science than men.女性在科学领域的贡献被低估了,相比男性而言。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7921):135-145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Virtual collaboration hinders a key component of creativity.虚拟协作阻碍了创造力的一个关键要素。
剖析墨西哥STEM领域学术晋升中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0324464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324464. eCollection 2025.
4
Tenure and research trajectories.任期与研究轨迹。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 29;122(30):e2500322122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500322122. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
5
Implementing team science in undergraduate medical physics research.在本科医学物理研究中实施团队科学。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70169. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70169.
6
Addressing gaps in author and reviewer gender diversity.解决作者和审稿人性别多样性方面的差距。
Nat Microbiol. 2025 Jul;10(7):1553-1554. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02066-9.
7
Gain efficiency with streamlined and automated data processing: Examples from high-throughput monoclonal antibody production.通过简化和自动化数据处理提高效率:来自高通量单克隆抗体制备的示例。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0326678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326678. eCollection 2025.
8
Authorship Trends and Gender Concordance in Surgical Research.外科研究中的作者趋势与性别一致性
J Surg Res. 2025 Jun 27;312:148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.001.
9
Science Speed Dating to Spur Inter-Institutional Collaborative Research.科学速配以促进机构间合作研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;22(6):919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060919.
10
Female authorship trends in a high-impact Canadian medical journal: a 10-year cross-sectional series, 2013-2023.加拿大一本高影响力医学期刊中的女性作者趋势:2013 - 2023年的10年横断面系列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e093157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093157.
Nature. 2022 May;605(7908):38-39. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00126-2.
4
Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services.姓名到性别的推理服务的比较与基准测试
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Jul 16;4:e156. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.156. eCollection 2018.
5
A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies.微软学术服务在科学学研究方面的综述。
Front Big Data. 2019 Dec 3;2:45. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00045. eCollection 2019.
6
Where are the women? Gender inequalities in COVID-19 research authorship.女性都在哪里?新冠疫情研究作者身份中的性别不平等现象。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002922.
7
Mentorship and protégé success in STEM fields.导师制与 STEM 领域中受指导者的成功
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14077-14083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915516117. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Women's Representation in Leadership Positions in Academic Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, and Surgical Oncology Programs.女性在学术肿瘤学、放射肿瘤学和外科肿瘤学项目中的领导职位中的代表性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0708.
9
Decoding team and individual impact in science and invention.解码科学和发明中的团队和个人影响力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):13885-13890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812341116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
10
Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.美国国立卫生研究院授予首次担任主要研究者的男性和女性的资助金额比较。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):898-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21944.