Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America.
Makerere University, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 6;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5.
Gender is often neglected in health systems, yet health systems are not gender neutral. Within health systems research, gender analysis seeks to understand how gender power relations create inequities in access to resources, the distribution of labour and roles, social norms and values, and decision-making. This paper synthesises findings from nine studies focusing on four health systems domains, namely human resources, service delivery, governance and financing. It provides examples of how a gendered and/or intersectional gender approach can be applied by researchers in a range of low- and middle-income settings (Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, India, China, Nigeria and Tanzania) to issues across the health system and demonstrates that these types of analysis can uncover new and novel ways of viewing seemingly intractable problems.
The research used a combination of mixed, quantitative, qualitative and participatory methods, demonstrating the applicability of diverse research methods for gender and intersectional analysis. Within each study, the researchers adapted and applied a variety of gender and intersectional tools to assist with data collection and analysis, including different gender frameworks. Some researchers used participatory tools, such as photovoice and life histories, to prompt deeper and more personal reflections on gender norms from respondents, whereas others used conventional qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion). Findings from across the studies were reviewed and key themes were extracted and summarised.
Five core themes that cut across the different projects were identified and are reported in this paper as follows: the intersection of gender with other social stratifiers; the importance of male involvement; the influence of gendered social norms on health system structures and processes; reliance on (often female) unpaid carers within the health system; and the role of gender within policy and practice. These themes indicate the relevance of and need for gender analysis within health systems research.
The implications of the diverse examples of gender and health systems research highlighted indicate that policy-makers, health practitioners and others interested in enhancing health system research and delivery have solid grounds to advance their enquiry and that one-size-fits-all heath interventions that ignore gender and intersectionality dimensions require caution. It is essential that we build upon these insights in our efforts and commitment to move towards greater equity both locally and globally.
性别在卫生系统中经常被忽视,但卫生系统并非对性别中立。在卫生系统研究中,性别分析旨在了解性别权力关系如何在获取资源、劳动和角色分配、社会规范和价值观以及决策方面造成不平等。本文综合了九项关注卫生系统四个领域的研究的结果,即人力资源、服务提供、治理和融资。它提供了一些例子,说明在一系列中低收入国家(柬埔寨、津巴布韦、乌干达、印度、中国、尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚),研究人员如何将性别视角和/或交叉性别视角应用于卫生系统各个领域的问题,并证明这些类型的分析可以揭示看待看似棘手问题的新方法。
该研究采用了混合、定量、定性和参与性方法相结合的方式,展示了多样化的研究方法在性别和交叉分析方面的适用性。在每项研究中,研究人员都采用了多种性别和交叉工具来协助数据收集和分析,包括不同的性别框架。一些研究人员使用参与性工具,如摄影和生活史,以促使受访者更深入地反思性别规范,而另一些研究人员则使用传统的定性方法(深入访谈、焦点小组讨论)。对整个研究的结果进行了审查,并提取和总结了关键主题。
确定了跨越不同项目的五个核心主题,并在本文中报告如下:性别与其他社会分层因素的交叉;男性参与的重要性;性别社会规范对卫生系统结构和过程的影响;卫生系统中对(通常是女性)无偿照顾者的依赖;以及政策和实践中的性别角色。这些主题表明了性别分析在卫生系统研究中的相关性和必要性。
所强调的性别与卫生系统研究的多样性例子表明,政策制定者、卫生从业人员和其他有兴趣加强卫生系统研究和提供服务的人有充分的理由推进他们的研究,并且一刀切的卫生干预措施忽视了性别和交叉性维度需要谨慎。我们必须在我们的努力和承诺中借鉴这些见解,以在本地和全球范围内实现更大的公平。