• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks.同质性和少数群体规模解释了社交网络中的感知偏差。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1078-1087. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0677-4. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks.同群效应影响社交网络中少数群体的排名。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 23;8(1):11077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29405-7.
3
Resampling reduces bias amplification in experimental social networks.重采样可减少实验社交网络中的偏差放大。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2084-2098. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01715-5. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy.社会知觉与社会现实概述:为何准确性胜过偏见和自我实现预言。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500062X. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
The Effect of Social Networks and Social Constructions on HIV Risk Perceptions.社交网络和社会建构对 HIV 风险认知的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Jan;24(1):206-221. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02637-y.
6
Social-cognitive biases underlying the development of ableism.导致残疾歧视产生的社会认知偏见。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2024;67:104-131. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Age-related changes in cognitive biases during adolescence.青少年时期认知偏差的年龄相关性变化。
J Adolesc. 2019 Jul;74:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Non-conscious bias in medical decision making: what can be done to reduce it?医学决策中的非意识偏见:可以采取什么措施来减少它?
Med Educ. 2011 Aug;45(8):768-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04026.x.
10
Exploring multicultural classroom dynamics: A network analysis.探索多元文化课堂动态:网络分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Jun;74:90-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender differences in collaboration and career progression in physics.物理学领域合作与职业发展中的性别差异。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 6;12(8):241536. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241536. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Network analysis with quantum dynamics clarifies why photosystem II exploits both chlorophyll a and b.利用量子动力学进行的网络分析阐明了光系统II为何同时利用叶绿素a和叶绿素b。
Sci Adv. 2025 May 9;11(19):eads0327. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads0327.
3
Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers.描述撤稿对出版生涯的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02154-0.
4
Quirks of cognition explain why we dramatically overestimate the size of minority groups.认知上的怪癖解释了为什么我们会极大地高估少数群体的规模。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 8;122(14):e2413064122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2413064122. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
5
Teacher-student empathic relationship shaping: an elimination mechanism for psychological segmentations in entrepreneurship education.师生共情关系塑造:创业教育中心理分化的一种消除机制。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 24;13(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02607-1.
6
How out-group animosity can shape partisan divisions: A model of affective polarization.群体外敌意如何塑造党派分歧:情感两极分化模型
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Mar 11;4(3):pgaf082. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf082. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Promoting fairness in link prediction with graph enhancement.通过图增强促进链接预测中的公平性。
Front Big Data. 2024 Oct 24;7:1489306. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1489306. eCollection 2024.
8
Implicit racial biases are lower in more populous more diverse and less segregated US cities.在人口更多、更多样化且隔离程度更低的美国城市,隐性种族偏见较低。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 6;15(1):961. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45013-8.
9
On the inadequacy of nominal assortativity for assessing homophily in networks.论名义 assortativity 在评估网络中同质性方面的不足。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):21053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48113-5.
10
Modelling Spirals of Silence and Echo Chambers by Learning from the Feedback of Others.通过借鉴他人反馈对沉默螺旋和回音室效应进行建模。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;24(10):1484. doi: 10.3390/e24101484.

同质性和少数群体规模解释了社交网络中的感知偏差。

Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Computational Social Science, GESIS, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1078-1087. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0677-4. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-019-0677-4
PMID:31406337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6839769/
Abstract

People's perceptions about the size of minority groups in social networks can be biased, often showing systematic over- or underestimation. These social perception biases are often attributed to biased cognitive or motivational processes. Here we show that both over- and underestimation of the size of a minority group can emerge solely from structural properties of social networks. Using a generative network model, we show that these biases depend on the level of homophily, its asymmetric nature and on the size of the minority group. Our model predictions correspond well with empirical data from a cross-cultural survey and with numerical calculations from six real-world networks. We also identify circumstances under which individuals can reduce their biases by relying on perceptions of their neighbours. This work advances our understanding of the impact of network structure on social perception biases and offers a quantitative approach for addressing related issues in society.

摘要

人们对社交网络中少数群体规模的看法可能存在偏差,通常表现为系统的高估或低估。这些社会感知偏差通常归因于有偏差的认知或动机过程。在这里,我们表明,对少数群体规模的高估和低估都可以仅从社交网络的结构属性中产生。使用生成网络模型,我们表明这些偏差取决于同质性水平、其非对称性性质以及少数群体的规模。我们的模型预测与来自跨文化调查的经验数据以及来自六个真实网络的数值计算结果非常吻合。我们还确定了个体可以通过依赖对邻居的看法来减少偏见的情况。这项工作增进了我们对网络结构对社会感知偏差的影响的理解,并为解决社会中相关问题提供了一种定量方法。