Lazzerini Marzia, Wanzira Humphrey, Lochoro Peter, Muyinda Richard, Segafredo Giulia, Wamani Henry, Putoto Giovanni
WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Doctors with Africa, CUAMM, Kampala, Uganda.
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 18;4(4):e001339. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001339. eCollection 2019.
Suboptimal quality of paediatric care has been reported in resource-limited settings, but little evidence exists on interventions to improve it in such settings. This study aimed at testing supportive supervision (SS) for improving health status of malnourished children, quality of case management, overall quality of care, and the absolute number of children enrolled in the nutritional services.
This was a cluster randomised trial conducted in Arua district. Six health centres (HCs) with the highest volume of work were randomised to either SS or no intervention. SS was delivered by to HCs staff (phase 1), and later extended to community health workers (CHWs) (phase 2). The primary outcome was the cure rate, measured at children level. Quality of case management was assessed by six pre-defined indicators. Quality of care was assessed using the national Nutrition Service Delivery Assessment (NSDA) tool. Access to care was estimated with the number of children accessing HC nutritional services.
Overall, 737 children were enrolled. In the intervention arm, the cure rate (83.8% vs 44.9%, risk ratio (RR)=1.91, 95% CI: 1.56-2.34, p=0.001), quality of care as scored by NSDA (RR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.01-2.44, p=0.035) and correctness in complementary treatment (RR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.40-1.67, p=0.001) were significantly higher compared with control. With the extension of SS to CHWs (phase 2), there was a significant 38.6% more children accessing care in the intervention HCs (RR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.44, p=0.001) compared with control.
SS significantly improved the cure rate of malnourished children, and the overall quality of care, SS to CHWs significantly increased the crude number of children enrolled in the nutritional services. More studies should confirm these results, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SS.
在资源有限的环境中,儿科护理质量欠佳的情况已被报道,但在此类环境中改善护理质量的干预措施的证据却很少。本研究旨在测试支持性监督(SS)对改善营养不良儿童健康状况、病例管理质量、整体护理质量以及营养服务登记儿童绝对数量的效果。
这是一项在阿鲁阿区进行的整群随机试验。将工作量最大的六个卫生中心(HCs)随机分为接受支持性监督组或无干预组。支持性监督先提供给卫生中心工作人员(第一阶段),随后扩展至社区卫生工作者(CHWs)(第二阶段)。主要结局是治愈率,在儿童层面进行测量。病例管理质量通过六个预先定义的指标进行评估。护理质量使用国家营养服务提供评估(NSDA)工具进行评估。通过获取卫生中心营养服务的儿童数量来估计获得护理的情况。
总体而言,共纳入737名儿童。在干预组中,治愈率(83.8%对44.9%,风险比(RR)=1.91,95%置信区间:1.56 - 2.34,p = 0.001)、NSDA评分的护理质量(RR = 1.57,95%置信区间:1.01 - 2.44,p = 0.035)以及补充治疗的正确性(RR = 1.52,95%置信区间:1.40 - 1.67,p = 0.001)均显著高于对照组。随着支持性监督扩展至社区卫生工作者(第二阶段),与对照组相比,干预卫生中心获得护理的儿童数量显著增加38.6%(RR = 1.26,95%置信区间:1.11 - 1.44,p = 0.001)。
支持性监督显著提高了营养不良儿童的治愈率和整体护理质量,对社区卫生工作者实施支持性监督显著增加了营养服务登记儿童的粗略数量。更多研究应证实这些结果,并评估支持性监督的成本效益。