Community Health Impact Coalition, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):114. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00754-6.
Supervision is essential for optimizing performance and motivation of community health workers (CHWs). This paper, the seventh in our series, "Community health workers at the dawn of a new era", supplements the existing evidence on CHW supervision in low- and middle-income countries by reviewing what supervision approaches are employed in specific contexts, identifying potential facilitators of CHW supervision including mobile health (mHealth) interventions, and noting challenges of supervision including the relationship between supervision and other CHW programme elements.
For this exploratory research study on CHW supervision, we reviewed the supervisory interventions described in a compendium of 29 case studies of large-scale CHW programmes, performed an electronic search of multiple databases to identify articles related to CHW supervision published between 15 June 2017 and 1 December 2020, and from those articles followed additional references that appeared to be relevant for our results.
We reviewed 55 case studies, academic articles, and grey literature resources as part of this exploratory research. A variety of supervision approaches have been adapted over time, which we grouped into five categories: external supervision, community supervision, group supervision, peer supervision, and dedicated supervision. These approaches are frequently used in combination. Digital (mHealth) technologies are being explored as potential facilitators of CHW supervision in both small- and large-scale programmes; however, evidence of their effectiveness remains limited to date. Inadequate support for supervisors is a major challenge, particularly given the numerous and varied roles they are expected to fulfil, spanning administrative, clinical, and supportive activities. Supervisors can help CHWs acquire other critical elements needed from the health system for them to perform more effectively: incentives to foster motivation, clarity of roles and tasks, adequate tools and supplies, appropriate knowledge and skills, and a safe work environment.
In the absence of a universal "best approach" for CHW supervision, our recommendation is that countries and programmes prioritize homegrown evolution over time to suit the local context. In some cases, this may involve scaling up novel approaches that have proven effective at small scale or testing approaches that have worked in other countries.
监督对于优化社区卫生工作者(CHW)的绩效和激励至关重要。本文是我们关于“新时代社区卫生工作者”系列的第七篇,通过回顾特定背景下采用的监督方法,识别包括移动医疗(mHealth)干预在内的潜在 CHW 监督促进因素,并注意监督面临的挑战,包括监督与其他 CHW 项目要素之间的关系,对中低收入国家的 CHW 监督进行了补充。
针对这项关于 CHW 监督的探索性研究,我们审查了 29 项大规模 CHW 项目案例研究综合报告中描述的监督干预措施,对多个数据库进行了电子搜索,以确定 2017 年 6 月 15 日至 2020 年 12 月 1 日期间发表的与 CHW 监督相关的文章,并从这些文章中跟进了似乎与我们的结果相关的其他参考文献。
作为这项探索性研究的一部分,我们审查了 55 项案例研究、学术文章和灰色文献资源。随着时间的推移,已经采用了各种监督方法,我们将其分为五类:外部监督、社区监督、小组监督、同伴监督和专门监督。这些方法经常结合使用。数字(mHealth)技术正在作为小规模和大规模计划中 CHW 监督的潜在促进因素进行探索;然而,迄今为止,它们有效性的证据仍然有限。对监督者的支持不足是一个主要挑战,尤其是因为他们需要履行众多且多样的角色,包括行政、临床和支持性活动。监督者可以帮助 CHW 获得他们为更有效地开展工作所需的来自卫生系统的其他关键要素:激励以促进积极性、明确角色和任务、充足的工具和用品、适当的知识和技能以及安全的工作环境。
在缺乏 CHW 监督的通用“最佳方法”的情况下,我们的建议是,各国和方案随着时间的推移优先考虑本土演变,以适应当地情况。在某些情况下,这可能涉及扩大在小规模上已被证明有效的新方法,或测试在其他国家有效的方法。