• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支撑3-E模型的医疗质量管理体系及其在澳大利亚一家新建三级医院的应用。

A healthcare quality management system underpinning the 3-E model and its application in a new tertiary hospital in Australia.

作者信息

Li Qun Catherine, Sweetman Greg

机构信息

Fiona Stanley Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Feb 28;4(2):112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.02.003. eCollection 2017 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.02.003
PMID:31406729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6626117/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Engaging, enhancing and embedding clinical audit improvement activities into everyday practice to develop capacity, capability and culture in continuous improvement.

METHOD

Through the implementation of an electronic quality management system called Governance, Evidence, Knowledge and Outcome (GEKO), the key aspects of governance, evidence knowledge and outcomes were able to be applied to quality initiatives. Implementation of the GEKO system incorporated the principles of total quality control and management to include strategic management control and marketing in parallel with leadership strategies.The vision was to motivate staff to enable ownership of the quality cycle of continuous improvement of patient care to incorporate underlying systems and processes that impact on patient care.

RESULTS

A continuous improvement pathway was successfully established 4 months post hospital commissioning. Over 890 (approximately 16% workforce) multidisciplinary and multi-professional staff received training and support for QIs in 12 months; over 535 quality proposals were received on GEKO. Submissions by profession: nursing and midwifery 46% (246), medical 33% (177), allied health 9% (48), pharmacy 5% (27), and non-clinical staff 7% (37). Average new submissions per month were 42. Reviews demonstrated the application of a rapid cycle approach to develop, test, modify and refine improvements and enhanced clinical care.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate governance structure, processes, extensive education and training together with collaborative relationships are the keys to embed clinical audit improvement into everyday practice. The availability of a quality management system like GEKO is very useful to make QI accessible to all staff.

摘要

目标

将临床审计改进活动融入日常实践,以培养持续改进的能力、技能和文化。

方法

通过实施名为治理、证据、知识与结果(GEKO)的电子质量管理系统,治理、证据、知识和结果的关键方面得以应用于质量改进举措。GEKO系统的实施纳入了全面质量管理原则,将战略管理控制和营销与领导策略并行。其愿景是激励员工实现患者护理持续改进质量循环的自主管理,纳入影响患者护理的基础系统和流程。

结果

在医院启用4个月后成功建立了持续改进路径。12个月内,超过890名(约占员工总数的16%)多学科和多专业工作人员接受了质量改进培训并获得支持;在GEKO上收到了超过535份质量提案。按专业分类的提交情况:护理和助产46%(246份),医疗33%(177份),专职医疗9%(48份),药学5%(27份),非临床工作人员7%(37份)。每月平均新提交提案42份。评审表明采用了快速循环方法来开发、测试、修改和完善改进措施,并改善了临床护理。

结论

适当的治理结构、流程、广泛的教育和培训以及合作关系是将临床审计改进融入日常实践的关键。像GEKO这样的质量管理系统的可用性对于让所有员工都能参与质量改进非常有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ba/6626117/e0b685a15da6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ba/6626117/cca993fd63b3/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ba/6626117/e0b685a15da6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ba/6626117/cca993fd63b3/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ba/6626117/e0b685a15da6/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
A healthcare quality management system underpinning the 3-E model and its application in a new tertiary hospital in Australia.支撑3-E模型的医疗质量管理体系及其在澳大利亚一家新建三级医院的应用。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Feb 28;4(2):112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.02.003. eCollection 2017 Apr 10.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why.昆士兰联合健康管理的现实主义评估:哪些措施有效、在何种背景下有效以及原因何在。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):466-473. doi: 10.1071/AH17265.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Interventions to support and develop clinician-researcher leadership in one health district.在一个健康区支持和培养临床医生-研究人员领导力的干预措施。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Jul 10;30(6):528-538. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2016-0104.
7
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the Cognitive Biases Related to Vaccination: A Scoping Review of the Literature.绘制与疫苗接种相关的认知偏差:文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 11;11(12):1837. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121837.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Frontline Leaders and Staff in Real-Time Improvement.让一线领导者和员工参与实时改进。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Apr;42(4):170-83. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42021-0.
2
Engaging Pediatric Resident Physicians in Quality Improvement Through Resident-Led Morbidity and Mortality Conferences.通过住院医师主导的发病率和死亡率会议让儿科住院医师参与质量改进。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Mar;42(3):99-106. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42012-x.
3
Engaging Frontline Staff in Performance Improvement: The American Organization of Nurse Executives Implementation of Transforming Care at the Bedside Collaborative.
让一线员工参与绩效改进:美国护士高管组织在床边实施变革护理协作项目
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Feb;42(2):61-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42007-6.
4
Building a Foundation of Continuous Improvement in a Rapidly Changing Environment: The Dartmouth-Hitchcock Value Institute Experience.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Oct;41(10):435-44. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41056-6.
5
Editorial: Moving Patients from Consultants to Partners in Health Care System Redesign: Achieving Meaningful Engagement.社论:在医疗保健系统重新设计中,将患者从顾问转变为合作伙伴:实现有意义的参与。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Dec;40(12):531-2. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40068-0.
6
Empowering Sustained Patient Safety: The Benefits of Combining Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches.增强持续的患者安全:自上而下与自下而上方法相结合的益处。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2015 Jul-Sep;30(3):240-6. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000103.
7
The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: a systematic review.医院管理者在质量和患者安全中的作用:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 5;4(9):e005055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005055.
8
Medical engagement: a crucial underpinning to organizational performance.医疗参与:组织绩效的关键支撑。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2011 Aug;24(3):114-20. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2011.011006.
9
The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices.理论在研究中的作用:开发和评估患者安全实践的实施。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):453-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047993. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
10
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.系统评价理论在指南传播和实施策略设计中的应用,以及对严格评估结果的解释。
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 9;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14.