Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Phys Ther. 2019 Dec 16;99(12):1628-1643. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz118.
The importance of motor learning knowledge for physical therapist practice is well known; however, its application is lacking. Conceptual frameworks that place motor learning knowledge within a clinical context are a potential mediator to overcome this gap.
This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify and describe the content of such conceptual frameworks in physical therapy/rehabilitation, including the approaches taken in their development and the "elements" or building blocks of motor learning-based interventions within each conceptual framework.
The data sources used were PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychInfo databases.
Articles that were selected had a primary focus on motor learning and its application in physical therapy/rehabilitation and were published between 2000 and 2017.
Twelve of 62 relevant articles met the inclusion criteria.
Papers attempted to translate theoretical knowledge into a coherent, clinically accessible conceptual framework via 3 main approaches: synthesizing selected motor learning elements into original new conceptual frameworks, mapping motor learning elements in current clinical practices, and assembling selected motor learning elements. The elements of motor learning that were common across papers included theoretical concepts (such as "meaningful goal setting" and "active involvement"); practice variables (including the type, frequency, and timing of feedback; the focus of instructions; task breakdown; and the amount, variability, and order of practice); and intervention strategies (task specific and mental practice). Psychological aspects related to self-efficacy and motivation were also considered integral.
Papers published before the year 2000 were excluded.
The scoping review revealed that the presentation of motor learning elements in a coherent framework encompassed very diverse approaches and used different categorization systems. In addition, to fully grasp the complexity of clinical practice, motor learning should be coupled with other fields of knowledge.
运动学习知识对于物理治疗师实践的重要性是众所周知的;然而,其应用却有所欠缺。将运动学习知识置于临床背景下的概念框架是克服这一差距的潜在媒介。
本研究旨在对文献进行范围综述,以识别和描述物理治疗/康复领域中此类概念框架的内容,包括其发展所采用的方法以及每个概念框架中基于运动学习的干预措施的“要素”或构建块。
使用的数据源是 PubMed、CINAHL 和 PsychInfo 数据库。
选择的文章主要关注运动学习及其在物理治疗/康复中的应用,并于 2000 年至 2017 年期间发表。
符合纳入标准的 62 篇相关文章中有 12 篇。
这些论文试图通过 3 种主要方法将理论知识转化为连贯的、临床可接受的概念框架:将选定的运动学习要素综合成原始的新概念框架;将运动学习要素映射到当前的临床实践中;以及组合选定的运动学习要素。这些论文中常见的运动学习要素包括理论概念(如“有意义的目标设定”和“积极参与”);实践变量(包括反馈的类型、频率和时间;指令的重点;任务分解;以及练习的数量、可变性和顺序);以及干预策略(任务特定和心理练习)。与自我效能和动机相关的心理方面也被认为是不可或缺的。
排除了 2000 年以前发表的论文。
范围综述显示,在连贯的框架中呈现运动学习要素的方法非常多样化,并使用了不同的分类系统。此外,为了全面理解临床实践的复杂性,运动学习应该与其他知识领域相结合。