Suppr超能文献

美国正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)和伽马相机诊断参考水平,以及非心脏核医学研究的可实现放射性药物活度。

U.S. PET/CT and Gamma Camera Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Administered Activities for Noncardiac Nuclear Medicine Studies.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, MEB 404, PO Box 19, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019 (M.D.B.); University Radiology, East Brunswick, NJ (M.D.B.); Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.F.B., M.S., D.A.G.); Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY (M.G.); Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich (B.A.H.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (D.C.Y.); and Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine and UK Healthcare, Lexington, KY (M.E.O.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2019 Oct;293(1):203-211. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190623. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

Abstract

Existing surveys of radiopharmaceutical doses for U.S. nuclear medicine laboratories are of limited scope and size. Dose data are important because they can be used to benchmark individual laboratories, understand geographic variations in practice, and provide source data for societal guidelines and appropriateness criteria. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable administered activities (AAAs) for 13 noncardiac adult gamma camera and PET/CT examinations were derived retrospectively from American College of Radiology accreditation data (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017). The calculated DRL and AAA are consistent with previously published surveys. The distributions of radiopharmaceutical doses across facilities are in general consistent but show variation within a particular examination. Analysis of dose distribution suggests this variation results from differences in clinical protocols, educational gaps, and/or equipment factors. The AAA for the surveyed facilities exceeds dose ranges proposed in societal practice guidelines for several common nuclear medicine studies. Compared with similar surveys from Europe and Japan, geographic variation is observed, with some doses greater and others lower than used in the United States. Overall, radiopharmaceutical dose variation within the United States and internationally, and deviation from societal guidelines, imply that these dose-related benchmarks may be used to further standardize and improve clinical practice.

摘要

现有的美国核医学实验室放射性药物剂量调查范围有限且规模较小。剂量数据很重要,因为它们可用于对各个实验室进行基准测试,了解实践中的地域差异,并为社会指南和适宜性标准提供原始数据。从美国放射学院认证数据(2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日)中回顾性得出了 13 项非心脏成人伽马相机和 PET/CT 检查的诊断参考水平(DRL)和可实现的给药活度(AAA)。计算出的 DRL 和 AAA 与先前发表的调查结果一致。放射性药物剂量在各医疗机构的分布总体上是一致的,但在特定检查中存在差异。剂量分布分析表明,这种差异是由于临床方案、教育差距和/或设备因素的不同造成的。所调查的医疗机构的 AAA 超过了几个常见核医学研究的社会实践指南中提出的剂量范围。与来自欧洲和日本的类似调查相比,观察到了地域差异,一些剂量较高,而另一些则低于美国的使用剂量。总体而言,美国和国际范围内放射性药物剂量的变化以及与社会指南的偏差表明,这些与剂量相关的基准可能用于进一步标准化和改进临床实践。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验