• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化与标准血压控制与脑小血管病生物标志物区域性变化的关联:SPRINT MIND 随机临床试验的事后二次分析。

Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Regional Changes in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Biomarkers: Post Hoc Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory and the Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core, Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio.

Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231055. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1055.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1055
PMID:36857053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9978954/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Little is known about the associations of strict blood pressure (BP) control with microstructural changes in small vessel disease markers.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the regional associations of intensive vs standard BP control with small vessel disease biomarkers, such as white matter lesions (WMLs), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and cerebral blood flow (CBF).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that compared intensive systolic BP (SBP) control (SBP target <120 mm Hg) vs standard control (SBP target <140 mm Hg) among participants aged 50 years or older with hypertension and without diabetes or a history of stroke. The study began randomization on November 8, 2010, and stopped July 1, 2016, with a follow-up duration of approximately 4 years. A total of 670 and 458 participants completed brain magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and follow-up, respectively, and comprise the cohort for this post hoc analysis. Statistical analyses for this post hoc analysis were performed between August 2020 and October 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

At baseline, 355 participants received intensive SBP treatment and 315 participants received standard SBP treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were regional changes in WMLs, FA, MD (in white matter regions of interest), and CBF (in gray matter regions of interest).

RESULTS

At baseline, 355 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [8.0] years; 200 men [56.3%]) received intensive BP treatment and 315 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.0 [8.4] years; 199 men [63.2%]) received standard BP treatment. Intensive treatment was associated with smaller mean increases in WML volume compared with standard treatment (644.5 mm3 vs 1258.1 mm3). The smaller mean increases were observed specifically in the deep white matter regions of the left anterior corona radiata (intensive treatment, 30.3 mm3 [95% CI, 16.0-44.5 mm3]; standard treatment, 80.5 mm3 [95% CI, 53.8-107.2 mm3]), left tapetum (intensive treatment, 11.8 mm3 [95% CI, 4.4-19.2 mm3]; standard treatment, 27.2 mm3 [95% CI, 19.4-35.0 mm3]), left superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (intensive treatment, 3.2 mm3 [95% CI, 0.7-5.8 mm3]; standard treatment, 9.4 mm3 [95% CI, 5.5-13.4 mm3]), left posterior corona radiata (intensive treatment, 26.0 mm3 [95% CI, 12.9-39.1 mm3]; standard treatment, 52.3 mm3 [95% CI, 34.8-69.8 mm3]), left splenium of the corpus callosum (intensive treatment, 45.4 mm3 [95% CI, 25.1-65.7 mm3]; standard treatment, 83.0 mm3 [95% CI, 58.7-107.2 mm3]), left posterior thalamic radiation (intensive treatment, 53.0 mm3 [95% CI, 29.8-76.2 mm3]; standard treatment, 106.9 mm3 [95% CI, 73.4-140.3 mm3]), and right posterior thalamic radiation (intensive treatment, 49.5 mm3 [95% CI, 24.3-74.7 mm3]; standard treatment, 102.6 mm3 [95% CI, 71.0-134.2 mm3]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that intensive BP treatment, compared with standard treatment, was associated with a slower increase of WMLs, improved diffusion tensor imaging, and FA and CBF changes in several brain regions that represent vulnerable areas that may benefit from more strict BP control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.

摘要

重要性

对于严格的血压(BP)控制与小血管疾病标志物的微观结构变化之间的关联,人们知之甚少。

目的

研究强化与标准 BP 控制与小血管疾病生物标志物(如白质病变[WML]、分数各向异性[FA]、平均弥散度[MD]和脑血流[CBF])的区域性关联。

设计、地点和参与者:收缩期血压干预试验(SPRINT)是一项多中心随机临床试验,比较了强化收缩压(SBP)控制(SBP 目标<120mmHg)与标准控制(SBP 目标<140mmHg)在 50 岁或以上有高血压且无糖尿病或中风史的患者中的疗效。研究于 2010 年 11 月 8 日开始随机分组,于 2016 年 7 月 1 日停止,随访时间约为 4 年。共有 670 名和 458 名参与者分别在基线和随访时完成了脑部磁共振成像,他们构成了本事后分析的队列。本事后分析的统计分析于 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 10 月进行。

干预

在基线时,355 名参与者接受强化 SBP 治疗,315 名参与者接受标准 SBP 治疗。

主要结局和测量

主要结局是 WML、FA、MD(在白质感兴趣区)和 CBF(在灰质感兴趣区)的区域性变化。

结果

在基线时,355 名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,67.7[8.0]岁;200 名男性[56.3%])接受强化 BP 治疗,315 名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,67.0[8.4]岁;199 名男性[63.2%])接受标准 BP 治疗。与标准治疗相比,强化治疗与 WML 体积的平均增加较小(644.5mm3 与 1258.1mm3)。这种较小的平均增加主要发生在左侧前冠状辐射的深部白质区域(强化治疗,30.3mm3[95%置信区间,16.0-44.5mm3];标准治疗,80.5mm3[95%置信区间,53.8-107.2mm3])、左侧 tapetum(强化治疗,11.8mm3[95%置信区间,4.4-19.2mm3];标准治疗,27.2mm3[95%置信区间,19.4-35.0mm3])、左侧额顶枕束(强化治疗,3.2mm3[95%置信区间,0.7-5.8mm3];标准治疗,9.4mm3[95%置信区间,5.5-13.4mm3])、左侧后冠状辐射(强化治疗,26.0mm3[95%置信区间,12.9-39.1mm3];标准治疗,52.3mm3[95%置信区间,34.8-69.8mm3])、左侧胼胝体压部(强化治疗,45.4mm3[95%置信区间,25.1-65.7mm3];标准治疗,83.0mm3[95%置信区间,58.7-107.2mm3])、左侧丘脑后辐射(强化治疗,53.0mm3[95%置信区间,29.8-76.2mm3];标准治疗,106.9mm3[95%置信区间,73.4-140.3mm3])和右侧丘脑后辐射(强化治疗,49.5mm3[95%置信区间,24.3-74.7mm3];标准治疗,102.6mm3[95%置信区间,71.0-134.2mm3])。

结论和相关性

本研究表明,与标准治疗相比,强化 BP 治疗与 WML 增加较慢、扩散张量成像改善以及几个代表脆弱区域的脑区的 FA 和 CBF 变化相关,这些区域可能受益于更严格的 BP 控制。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01206062。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/aa27acc63c1f/jamanetwopen-e231055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/3d180d3493cc/jamanetwopen-e231055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/64ab643eb4a3/jamanetwopen-e231055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/aa27acc63c1f/jamanetwopen-e231055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/3d180d3493cc/jamanetwopen-e231055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/64ab643eb4a3/jamanetwopen-e231055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c75/9978954/aa27acc63c1f/jamanetwopen-e231055-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Regional Changes in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Biomarkers: Post Hoc Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制与脑小血管病生物标志物区域性变化的关联:SPRINT MIND 随机临床试验的事后二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231055. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1055.
2
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral Blood Flow: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制与脑血流的关系:SPRINT MIND 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):380-389. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0074.
3
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Trial.强化与标准血压控制与阿尔茨海默病磁共振成像生物标志物的关联:SPRINT MIND 随机试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):568-577. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0178.
4
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions.强化与标准血压控制与脑白质病变的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 13;322(6):524-534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10551.
5
Kidney Disease, Hypertension Treatment, and Cerebral Perfusion and Structure.肾脏病、高血压治疗与脑灌注和结构
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 May;79(5):677-687.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.024. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial.标准血压控制与强化血压控制对小血管病患者脑血流的影响:PRESERVE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):720-727. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.5153.
7
Identifying Patients for Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Based on Cognitive Benefit: A Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT Randomized Clinical Trial.基于认知获益识别需要强化降压治疗的患者:SPRINT 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314443. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14443.
8
Associations of High-Sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Levels With Outcomes After Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering: Findings From the SPRINT Randomized Clinical Trial.高强度降压治疗后高敏肌钙蛋白和利钠肽水平与结局的相关性:SPRINT 随机临床试验的结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;6(12):1397-1405. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3187.
9
Assessment of Long-term Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Residual Life Span: Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).评估强化血压控制对剩余预期寿命的长期获益:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):576-581. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6192.
10
Association of Cerebral Blood Flow With Longitudinal Changes in Cerebral Microstructural Integrity in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.脑血流与冠状动脉风险发展在年轻人(CARDIA)研究中脑微结构完整性纵向变化的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231189. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31189.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing spatiotemporal white matter hyperintensity pathophysiology in vivo to disentangle vascular and neurodegenerative contributions.在体内表征白质高信号的时空病理生理学,以厘清血管和神经退行性病变的影响。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.10.25329342. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.10.25329342.
2
Mechanisms of interventions targeting modifiable factors for dementia risk reduction.针对可改变因素降低痴呆风险的干预机制。
Mol Neurodegener. 2025 Jun 23;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13024-025-00845-w.
3
Hypertension in Pregnancy Linked to Cerebral Small Vessel Disease 15 Years Later.

本文引用的文献

1
Left Atrial Function and Arrhythmias in Relation to Small Vessel Disease on Brain MRI: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.左心房功能与脑 MRI 小血管疾病相关的心律失常:动脉粥样硬化的多民族研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 18;11(20):e026460. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026460. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
Brain Structure Among Middle-aged and Older Adults With Long-standing Type 1 Diabetes in the DCCT/EDIC Study.在 DCCT/EDIC 研究中,中年和老年长期 1 型糖尿病患者的大脑结构。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Aug 1;45(8):1779-1787. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2438.
3
Association of Brain Volumes and White Matter Injury With Race, Ethnicity, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
孕期高血压与15年后的脑小血管疾病有关。
Hypertension. 2025 Aug;82(8):1326-1335. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24544. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
4
Assessing the Global Impact of Brain Small Vessel Disease on Cognition: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.评估脑小血管疾病对认知的全球影响:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jun;21(6):e70326. doi: 10.1002/alz.70326.
5
Microstructural damage and lower myelin content in the Brainstem associated with hypertension.与高血压相关的脑干微结构损伤和髓磷脂含量降低。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Mar 26. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02184-1.
6
Blood Pressure and Cognitive Function in Older Adults.老年人的血压与认知功能。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2024 Nov;40(4):597-613. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
Hypertension, Neurodegeneration, and Cognitive Decline.高血压、神经退行性变和认知能力下降。
Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):991-1007. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21356. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
8
Update on modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症可改变风险因素的最新进展。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2024 Apr 1;37(2):166-181. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001243. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
9
Associations of Cerebrovascular Regulation and Arterial Stiffness With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑小血管病与脑血管调节及动脉僵硬度的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e032616. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032616. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
10
Implications of fitting a two-compartment model in single-shell diffusion MRI.单壳层扩散 MRI 中双室模型拟合的意义。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 Oct 26;68(21). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0216.
脑容量和白质损伤与种族、民族和心血管危险因素的关系:动脉粥样硬化的多种族研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e023159. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023159. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
4
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral Blood Flow: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制与脑血流的关系:SPRINT MIND 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):380-389. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0074.
5
Test-retest reliability of arterial spin labelling for cerebral blood flow in older adults with small vessel disease.老年人小血管病脑血流动脉自旋标记的复测信度。
Transl Stroke Res. 2022 Aug;13(4):583-594. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00983-5. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
6
Regulation of Blood Flow in the Cerebral Posterior Circulation by Parasympathetic Nerve Fibers: Physiological Background and Possible Clinical Implications in Patients With Vertebrobasilar Stroke.副交感神经纤维对脑后循环血流的调节:生理背景及对椎基底动脉卒中患者的潜在临床意义
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 29;12:660373. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.660373. eCollection 2021.
7
SPRINT Revisited: Updated Results and Implications.SPRINT 研究再评价:更新结果与启示
Hypertension. 2021 Dec;78(6):1701-1710. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17682. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Frontal white matter lesions in Alzheimer's disease are associated with both small vessel disease and AD-associated cortical pathology.阿尔茨海默病患者的额部白质病变与小血管疾病和 AD 相关的皮质病理学均有关。
Acta Neuropathol. 2021 Dec;142(6):937-950. doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02376-2. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
PRESERVE: Randomized Trial of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control in Small Vessel Disease.PRESERVE:小血管疾病强化与标准血压控制的随机试验。
Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(8):2484-2493. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032054. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Trial.强化与标准血压控制与阿尔茨海默病磁共振成像生物标志物的关联:SPRINT MIND 随机试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):568-577. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0178.