• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国政府应退出《残疾人权利公约》。

The UK Government should withdraw from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

机构信息

Locum Consultant Psychiatrist, St George's Mental Health NHS Trust; and Clinical Lecturer in Psychiatry at St George's, University of London, UK.

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust Chair in Mental Health Law, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):296-300. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.182.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.2019.182
PMID:31409438
Abstract

Many psychiatrists in the UK may be surprised to find that the Government ratified a convention ten years ago that suggests compulsory mental health treatment be prohibited. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is arguably the most important legal instrument that no one in psychiatry ever discusses, but if moved from ratification to enforcement it would have enormous effect on day-to-day practice. Here, Dr Paul Gosney argues that the convention if enforced would be damaging for the people it aims to protect, whereas Professor Peter Bartlett defends it as a necessary challenge to the inequalities in our current system.

摘要

许多英国精神病医生可能会惊讶地发现,政府十年前批准了一项公约,该公约建议禁止强制性的精神健康治疗。《残疾人权利公约》可以说是精神病学界从未讨论过的最重要的法律文书,但如果从批准变为执行,它将对日常实践产生巨大影响。在这里,Paul Gosney 博士认为,如果该公约得到执行,将对其旨在保护的人造成损害,而 Peter Bartlett 教授则认为这是对我们当前制度中不平等现象的必要挑战。

相似文献

1
The UK Government should withdraw from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.英国政府应退出《残疾人权利公约》。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):296-300. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.182.
2
Is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Impacting Mental Health Laws and Policies in High-Income Countries? A Case Study of Implementation in Canada.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对高收入国家的精神卫生法律和政策有影响吗?以加拿大的实施情况为例
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0103-1.
3
[The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].[《联合国残疾人权利公约》对德国关于强制手段的司法管辖权及合法化的影响]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2018 Aug;86(8):485-492. doi: 10.1055/a-0597-2031. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a new approach to decision-making in mental health law.《联合国残疾人权利公约》:精神卫生法决策的新方法。
Eur J Health Law. 2012 Dec;19(5):423-40. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341237.
5
Against a singular understanding of legal capacity: Criminal responsibility and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.反对对法律行为能力的单一理解:刑事责任与《残疾人权利公约》
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 May-Jun;40:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
The Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: More Than Just Another Reform of Psychiatry.《残疾人权利公约》的实施:不仅仅是另一次精神医学改革。
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):151-161.
7
Canada Should Retain Its Reservation on the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.加拿大应保留其对联合国《残疾人权利公约》的保留意见。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;63(12):809-812. doi: 10.1177/0706743718784939. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
The CRPD and mental health law reform in Scotland.《残疾人权利公约》与苏格兰精神卫生法改革。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 May-Jun;94:101991. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101991. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
9
Legal capacity under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.《残疾人权利公约》规定的法律行为能力。
J Law Med. 2012 Sep;20(1):22-7.
10
[The United Nations conventions on the rights of persons with disabilities: which strategies for protection at work?].[《联合国残疾人权利公约》:工作场所的哪些保护策略?]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2012 Jul-Sep;34(3 Suppl):232-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Human rights promotion and the 'Geneva impasse' in mental healthcare: scoping review.精神卫生保健中的人权促进与“日内瓦僵局”:范围审查
BJPsych Open. 2023 Apr 11;9(3):e58. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.50.
2
Autonomy, liberty, and risk: The ethical and legal challenges of suspending leave of absence for patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.自主性、自由和风险:在 COVID-19(冠状病毒)大流行期间,根据 1983 年《精神健康法》对被拘留的患者暂停休假所带来的伦理和法律挑战。
Med Sci Law. 2022 Jul;62(3):216-224. doi: 10.1177/00258024221099691. Epub 2022 May 12.